From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Bezio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 21, 2012
96 A.D.3d 1268 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-06-21

In the Matter of William WALKER, Petitioner, v. Norman R. BEZIO, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Respondent.

William Walker, Alden, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


William Walker, Alden, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner missed his library call out and was found in his cell. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with violating facility movement regulations. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charge and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see *906Matter of Williams v. Fischer, 92 A.D.3d 1053, 1054, 937 N.Y.S.2d 900 [2012];Matter of Joseph v. LaClair, 89 A.D.3d 1298, 932 N.Y.S.2d 590 [2011],lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 809, 2012 WL 1033678 [2012] ). Although petitioner maintained that he never received the call out at issue, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Povoski v. Fischer, 93 A.D.3d 963, 939 N.Y.S.2d 724 [2012];Matter of Joseph v. LaClair, 89 A.D.3d at 1298, 932 N.Y.S.2d 590). Petitioner's remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review due to his failure to raise them either at the hearing or in his administrative appeal.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

PETERS, P.J., MERCURE, MALONE JR., KAVANAGH and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walker v. Bezio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 21, 2012
96 A.D.3d 1268 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Walker v. Bezio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of William WALKER, Petitioner, v. Norman R. BEZIO, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 21, 2012

Citations

96 A.D.3d 1268 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5055
946 N.Y.S.2d 905

Citing Cases

Smith v. Quinn

Although the Attorney General did not submit a complete certified hearing transcript with the answer (…

Tuitt v. Martuscello

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of…