From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Nigel Joseph v. Laclair

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 17, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-17

In the Matter of Nigel JOSEPH, Petitioner,v.Darwin LaCLAIR, as Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Nigel Joseph, Malone, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Nigel Joseph, Malone, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner disobeyed a correction officer's directive to perform his porter duties and, as a result, was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charge, and the determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Applewhite v. Goord, 22 A.D.3d 985, 986, 802 N.Y.S.2d 389 [2005]; Matter of Loper v. Greene, 19 A.D.3d 947, 948, 797 N.Y.S.2d 190 [2005], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 713, 806 N.Y.S.2d 163, 840 N.E.2d 132 [2005] ). Petitioner's claim that he did not hear the order because he was arguing with another inmate presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Lamage v. Fischer, 58 A.D.3d 1045, 1046, 870 N.Y.S.2d 809 [2009]; Matter of Raqiyb v. Fischer, 50 A.D.3d 1287, 1288, 854 N.Y.S.2d 677 [2008] ). Therefore, we decline to disturb the determination.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Nigel Joseph v. Laclair

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 17, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Nigel Joseph v. Laclair

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Nigel JOSEPH, Petitioner,v.Darwin LaCLAIR, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 1298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
89 A.D.3d 1298
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8253

Citing Cases

Walker v. Bezio

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of…

Smith v. Quinn

Although the Attorney General did not submit a complete certified hearing transcript with the answer (…