From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

 Povoski v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 8, 2012
93 A.D.3d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-8

In the Matter of Frank J. POVOSKI Jr., Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

Frank J. Povoski Jr., Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.


Frank J. Povoski Jr., Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with being out of place and leaving an assigned work area. According to the report, after attending an inmate liaison committee meeting, petitioner went to his cellblock instead of returning to his assigned work program at the facility law library. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

*725 The detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Crenshaw v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 1189, 1189, 929 N.Y.S.2d 346 [2011]; Matter of Gillard v. White, 79 A.D.3d 1466, 1466, 912 N.Y.S.2d 460 [2010] ). Notably, while petitioner disputed the correction officer's testimony that petitioner did not have permission to be out of place, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Williams v. Fischer, 89 A.D.3d 1333, 1333, 932 N.Y.S.2d 915 [2011] ). Moreover, contrary to petitioner's contention, any gaps or omissions in the hearing transcript did not render it so incomplete as to preclude meaningful review ( see Matter of Machicote v. Bezio, 87 A.D.3d 763, 763, 928 N.Y.S.2d 382 [2011] ).

We have examined the remaining issues raised by petitioner, and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

MERCURE, Acting P.J., ROSE, SPAIN, STEIN and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

 Povoski v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 8, 2012
93 A.D.3d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

 Povoski v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Frank J. POVOSKI Jr., Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1706
939 N.Y.S.2d 724

Citing Cases

Nieves v. Venettozzi

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review a determination finding him guilty of having…

Walker v. Bezio

The detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see…