From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nieves v. Venettozzi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2013
102 A.D.3d 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-01-17

In the Matter of Jeffrey NIEVES, Petitioner, v. D. VENETTOZZI, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Jeffrey Nieves, Malone, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Jeffrey Nieves, Malone, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review a determination finding him guilty of having violated certain prison disciplinary rules. The detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it provide substantial evidence to support that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of being out of place ( see Matter of Povoski v. Fischer, 93 A.D.3d 963, 964, 939 N.Y.S.2d 724 [2012],appeal dismissed19 N.Y.3d 1020, 951 N.Y.S.2d 715, 976 N.E.2d 244 [2012];Matter of Jackson v. Smith, 49 A.D.3d 933, 933, 852 N.Y.S.2d 492 [2008] ). Petitioner's assertion that he had permission to be in the area where he was found created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Povoski v. Fischer, 93 A.D.3d at 964, 939 N.Y.S.2d 724). Respondent concedes, however, and we agree, that the determination finding petitioner guilty of making false statements must be annulled. Inasmuch as petitioner has already served the penalty imposed and no loss of good time was involved, remittal to redetermine the penalty is unnecessary ( see Matter of Franza v. Venettozzi, 98 A.D.3d 782, 782–783, 949 N.Y.S.2d 808 [2012] ).

Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent they are properly before us, are without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of making false statements; petition granted to that extent and the Commissionerof Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.

PETERS, P.J., MERCURE, ROSE, STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nieves v. Venettozzi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2013
102 A.D.3d 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Nieves v. Venettozzi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jeffrey NIEVES, Petitioner, v. D. VENETTOZZI, as Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 17, 2013

Citations

102 A.D.3d 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
957 N.Y.S.2d 910
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 249

Citing Cases

Sylvester v. Fischer

Initially, respondent concedes, and we agree, that petitioner was not provided with the necessary…

Rivera v. Fischer

Upon review of the record, we agree and annul the determination to that extent. Inasmuch as a loss of good…