From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schumaci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 18, 1999

Appeal from Order of Oneida County Court, Donalty, J. — Dismiss Indictment.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., SCUDDER AND BALIO, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly dismissed the indictment on the ground that the Grand Jury proceeding was defective ( see, CPL 210.20 [c]). Defendant testified before the Grand Jury with his attorney at his side. During the proceeding, defendant attempted to confer with his attorney, but the prosecutor told defendant that he could not speak with his attorney. Thus, defendant was denied his right to seek the advice of counsel during his testimony in violation of CPL 190.52 (2) ( cf., People v. Diaz, 211 A.D.2d 402, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 972). That violation impaired the integrity of the Grand Jury proceeding, and there was "an articulable `likelihood of' * * * prejudice" to defendant ( People v. Adessa, 89 N.Y.2d 677, 686; see, CPL 210.35; People v. Huston, 88 N.Y.2d 400, 409; People v. Biro, 171 Misc.2d 165, 166-168).


Summaries of

People v. Schumaci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Schumaci

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 838

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

We conclude that defendant knowingly entered into the waiver agreement, understood the nature and…

People v. Enoe

) When a witness is denied his right to confer with his attorney during his testimony, it is a violation of…