From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 3, 1995
211 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

January 3, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.).


The trial court properly granted the People's application to close the courtroom since the undercover officer had ongoing investigations in the same area where the drug sale in question occurred, and she intended to return to the area in the near future (People v. Badillo, 207 A.D.2d 742).

Defendant was not denied his right to counsel during the Grand Jury proceeding pursuant to CPL 190.52 (1). Even if counsel sat 20 feet away from defendant during the Grand Jury proceedings, there is no indication in the record either that the prosecutor prevented defendant from conferring with his attorney, or that defendant sought to confer with counsel and was unable to do so.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 3, 1995
211 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTONIO DIAZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 3, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 36

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

Defendant, who personally participated and asked questions numerous times throughout the proceeding, never…

People v. Schumaci

During the proceeding, defendant attempted to confer with his attorney, but the prosecutor told defendant…