From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaparos v. Bay Ridge Mitsubishi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1998
249 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 20, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff's action is barred by the four-year Statute of Limitations imposed by Uniform Commercial Code § 2-275 ( see, Heller v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp., 64 N.Y.2d 407; Doyle v. Happy Tumbler Wash-O-Mat, 90 A.D.2d 366; Weinstein v. General Motors Corp., 51 A.D.2d 335; Constable v. Colonie Truck Sales, 37 A.D.2d 1011).

Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kaparos v. Bay Ridge Mitsubishi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1998
249 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Kaparos v. Bay Ridge Mitsubishi

Case Details

Full title:EVANGELIA KAPAROS, Appellant, v. BAY RIDGE MITSUBISHI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 20, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 683

Citing Cases

Praetorian Ins. Co. v. IMI Cornelius, Inc.

In the case at bar, delivery of the ice machine was made to BLT on July 1, 200 5, and the fire occurred on…

Krivisky v. General Motors Corp.

( Stillman v Twentieth Century Fox Films Corp., 3 NY2d 395). In an attempt to circumvent UCC 2-725(2) and…