From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eldridge v. Transport Drivers

Workers' Compensation Commission
Jan 4, 1995
2229 CRB 2 (Conn. Work Comp. 1995)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2229 CRB-2-94-12

JANUARY 4, 1995


DISMISSAL ORDER

The trier's approval of Respondents' Form 36 was predicated on the basis of an informal hearing. Thus, no record exists as to the underlying proceeding. Without a record of the underlying proceeding we are unable to engage in meaningful review and cannot properly consider this appeal in accordance with § 31-301 C.G.S. See e.g., Warchola v. U.S. Gypsum Specialists, 11 Conn. Workers' Comp. Rev. Op. 108, 1444 CRB 1-92-6 (1993); Nevers v. Environmental Waste Removal, 10 Conn. Workers' Comp. Rev. Op. 96, 1166 CRD-5-91-1 (1992); Kempesta v. Hendels Gas and Oil Co., 9 Conn. Workers' Comp. Rev. Op. 152, 998 CRD-2-90-4 (1991).

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as there must be further proceedings in order to assure an adequate record.

Jesse M. Frankl, Chairman Compensation Review Board Workers' Compensation Commission


Summaries of

Eldridge v. Transport Drivers

Workers' Compensation Commission
Jan 4, 1995
2229 CRB 2 (Conn. Work Comp. 1995)
Case details for

Eldridge v. Transport Drivers

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ELDRIDGE, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT v. TRANSPORT DRIVERS, EMPLOYER and INS…

Court:Workers' Compensation Commission

Date published: Jan 4, 1995

Citations

2229 CRB 2 (Conn. Work Comp. 1995)

Citing Cases

Torres v. United Illuminating

The Compensation Review Board is thus unable to engage in any meaningful review and therefore the matter is…