From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 3, 2019
268 So. 3d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2D18-892

04-03-2019

Curay J. DAVIS, a/k/a Curay Jerome Davis, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

VILLANTI, Judge.

Curay Jerome Davis challenges the trial court's imposition of a $ 500 fine and 5% surcharge. Davis properly preserved this issue by filing a motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The State responded by arguing that the fine was a mandatory fine, relying on section 893.13(1)(d)(3), Florida Statutes (2017). But the statute did not factually apply to Davis's case because he was not charged with the sale of a controlled substance within 1000 feet of a proscribed location. Rather, the fine was discretionary and the trial court was thus required to pronounce the statutory authority for the fine, section 775.083, Florida Statutes (2017). See Perdue v. State, 17 So.3d 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (holding that the trial court erred in failing to orally pronounce the statutory authority for the discretionary $ 525 fines and surcharges).

Because the trial court erred by failing to orally pronounce the statutory authority, we remand for entry of a corrected judgment striking the $ 500 fine and 5% surcharge. In all other respects, we affirm.

LUCAS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 3, 2019
268 So. 3d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:CURAY J. DAVIS, a/k/a CURAY JEROME DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 3, 2019

Citations

268 So. 3d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

Paris v. State

This omission requires that the fine be reversed. See, e.g. , Davis v. State , 268 So. 3d 877, 878 (Fla. 2d…