From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perdue v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 2, 2009
17 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Summary

holding that the trial court erred in failing to orally pronounce the statutory authority for the discretionary $ 525 fines and surcharges

Summary of this case from Davis v. State

Opinion

No. 2D07-5646.

October 2, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Steven L. Selph, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert F. Moeller, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


John Thomas Perdue challenges the trial court's imposition of a $525 fine and surcharge and $20 Crime Stoppers Trust Fund cost in case CF07-0765, and another $525 fine and surcharge and $20 Crime Stoppers Trust Fund cost in case CF07-3377. Perdue properly preserved these issues by filing a motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). See Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562, 574 (Fla. 2008) ("[T]he imposition of costs without statutory authority is a `sentencing error' for purposes of rule 3.800(b)." (citing Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89, 109 (Fla. 2000))). However, the trial court denied Perdue's motion as to these claims.

The State concedes the trial court erred by failing to orally pronounce the statutory authority for imposing the $525 fine and surcharge pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes (2006). We agree. See Masengale v. State, 969 So.2d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Dadds v. State, 946 So.2d 1129, 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Likewise, the trial court erred by imposing the two $20 mandatory costs towards the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund. Section 938.06(1) authorizes the cost as "an additional surcharge" to "any fine prescribed by law." Because the $525 in fines and surcharges were not properly imposed, the additional $20 costs under section 938.06 must also fail. Masengale, 969 So.2d at 1219; Dadds, 946 So.2d at 1130. Accordingly, the $525 in fines and surcharges and $20 Crime Stoppers Trust Fund costs in both cases must be stricken.

Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected judgment striking the $525 in fines and surcharges and $20 Crime Stoppers Trust Fund costs.

WALLACE and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Perdue v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 2, 2009
17 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

holding that the trial court erred in failing to orally pronounce the statutory authority for the discretionary $ 525 fines and surcharges

Summary of this case from Davis v. State
Case details for

Perdue v. State

Case Details

Full title:John Thomas PERDUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 2, 2009

Citations

17 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Bryant v. State

We strike the $500 fine because the trial court failed to pronounce it orally. See Perdue v. State, 17 So.3d…

Smith v. State

Because the $175 fine was not properly imposed, the trial court could not impose the additional $20…