From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carpenter v. Garland County Probation Parole Staff

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division
Jan 30, 2008
Civil No. 07-6072 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-6072.

January 30, 2008


ORDER


Now on this 30th day of January 2008, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on January 7, 2008, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 14). The parties have not filed written objections to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, this action is dismissed on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, fail to state claims upon which relief can be granted, or are not presently cognizable under § 1983. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii) (IFP action, or any portion thereof, may be dismissed on such grounds at any time).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carpenter v. Garland County Probation Parole Staff

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division
Jan 30, 2008
Civil No. 07-6072 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Carpenter v. Garland County Probation Parole Staff

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ALAN CARPENTER PLAINTIFF v. GARLAND COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division

Date published: Jan 30, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 07-6072 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Eiland v. United States Postal Serv.

None of them, by their terms or structure, provide for a private right of action. See Carpenter v. …

Eiland v. United States Postal Serv.

None of them, by their terms or structure, provide for a private right of action. See Carpenter v. …