From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boley v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 502972.

April 24, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Anthony Boley, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Kane and Stein, JJ.


While petitioner was being escorted to the restroom, he suddenly moved aggressively toward a correction officer and attempted to "head-butt" him. Petitioner then continued to struggle with correction officers, despite their repeated orders to stop resisting, until the officers ultimately took him to the floor and applied leg irons. Petitioner was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with attempted assault, engaging in violent conduct and refusing a direct order. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all three charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the misbehavior report, together with the related documentation and photographs, along with the extensive hearing testimony, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Shankle v Goord, 45 AD3d 1084, 1085, lv denied 10 NY3d 701). Regarding petitioner's claim of inadequate employee assistance, it is neither substantiated in the record nor is there any indication that petitioner suffered any prejudice ( see Matter of White v Selsky, 3 AD3d 762, 763). To the extent not specifically addressed herein, petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Boley v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Boley v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY BOLEY, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 1411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3536
857 N.Y.S.2d 287

Citing Cases

Smith v. Prack

possess a weapon and smuggling is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the first misbehavior…

Jackson v. Dubray

We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with the related documentation, photographs and testimony…