From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shankle v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 15, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1084 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502238.

November 15, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

William Shankle, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.


As a result of a physical altercation involving petitioner and two correction officers, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in violent conduct, assaulting staff and refusing a direct order. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. On administrative appeal, the determination was affirmed with a modified penalty of 15 months in the special housing unit and a corresponding loss of privileges, as well as a recommended loss of good time. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the misbehavior report and testimony at the hearing, together with the related documentation and photographs, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 40 AD3d 1335, 1336). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that the gaps in the hearing transcript preclude meaningful appellate review and the modified penalty was excessive, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Shankle v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 15, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1084 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Shankle v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM SHANKLE, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 15, 2007

Citations

45 A.D.3d 1084 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 8813
844 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

In re Harry West

Petitioner claimed that the disciplinary charges were fabricated in retaliation for earlier complaints made…

Cruz v. Fischer

We now confirm. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the determination of guilt is supported by substantial…