From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Dubray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 13, 2008
56 A.D.3d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 504369.

November 13, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Edward Koehl, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in two separate misbehavior reports with engaging in violent conduct, attempting to assault a staff member, refusing a direct order and committing an unhygienic act. Following a combined tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with the related documentation, photographs and testimony adduced at the hearing, comprise substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Boley v Selsky, 50 AD3d 1411, 1412). To the extent that petitioner offered a retaliation defense, a credibility issue was created for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Kearney v Fischer, 51 AD3d 1185, 1186). Petitioner's assertion that he was deprived of adequate employee assistance is unsubstantiated by the record and, in any event, there is no indication that he suffered any prejudice as a result of the purported deficiencies ( see Matter of Gonzalez v Fischer, 53 AD3d 945, 946). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was denied the right to present witness testimony and that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been scrutinized and found to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Dubray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 13, 2008
56 A.D.3d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Jackson v. Dubray

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DARYL JACKSON, Petitioner, v. KEITH DUBRAY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8576
867 N.Y.S.2d 750

Citing Cases

Wright v. Fischer

We confirm. The misbehavior report and related documentation, together with the testimony of the correction…

Walker v. Fischer

The misbehavior report, related documentation and testimony of the correction officer involved in the…