Section 13.09 - Joint committee on finance(1) There is created a joint standing committee, to be known as the joint committee on finance, consisting of 8 senators and 8 representatives to the assembly appointed as are the members of standing committees in their respective houses.(3) The committee may inquire into the operations or activities of any agency, department, board, institution or commission of the state, to determine better methods, systems or procedures for improving state government operations.(5) Within one week after the general election in November of those years in which gubernatorial election is held, if the incumbent governor is not reelected, the committee shall convene and approve a budget for the newly elected governor to enable the incoming governor to review and analyze the budget, to hire staff and obtain space, and to do such other tasks as the committee approves. Funds approved by the committee shall be released to the office of the governor from the appropriation under s. 20.525(1) (a) and any staff employed or expenses incurred by the incoming governor shall be charged to that appropriation. Employees of the incoming governor shall be placed on the payroll of the office of the governor. The procedures under s. 13.10 do not apply to this subsection.(6) The joint committee on finance shall maintain its offices and meeting room on the 4th floor of the east wing of the capitol.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 20,s 1t, eff. 7/2/2013.1971 c. 125; 1975 c. 224; 1977 c. 325; 1981 c. 20 ss. 2e, 2m, 3s, 3t; 1983 a. 3, 27; 1983 a. 83 s. 22; 1983 a. 308, 377, 524, 538; 1985 a. 2, 29, 300; 1987 a. 4, 307; 1989 a. 31. Nonpartisanship is not a requirement of the committee clerk position, and the clerk does not work for a nonpartisan agency or perform nonpartisan budgetary or policy analysis. Nevertheless, given the nature of the clerk's responsibilities, a decision maker could reasonably consider an applicant's history of partisan activity. However, an applicant's political affiliation and the applicant's history of partisan activities are two distinct considerations. Albers-Anders v. Pocan, 905 F. Supp. 2d 944 (2012).