Current through Acts 2023-2024, ch. 1069
Section 54-5-804 - State to pay certain relocation costs - Exceptions - Reimbursement payments(a) The commissioner is authorized to reimburse a utility for the cost of relocation, and to include the cost as a highway construction project cost, where the cost of relocation arises from the relocation of a utility facility located on a public highway right-of-way and the highway construction project is undertaken by the department, subject to the following conditions: (1) The utility shall fully comply with § 54-5-854(b), including the preparation and submission to the department of the utility's relocation plan, cost estimate and schedule of calendar days for completing the relocation, within the time period specified or within an additional time that may be allowed under § 54-5-854(b); and(2) The utility shall either: (A) Enter into a written agreement with the commissioner to include the relocation as a part of the department's highway construction contract; provided, however, that the agreement may provide that the utility shall perform certain relocation work with its own union employees as required under a negotiated organized labor contract; but, in that case, the utility shall be required to reimburse the department for all relocation costs if it fails to timely perform its relocation work as provided in the agreement with the commissioner; or(B) Enter into a written agreement with the commissioner to remove all utility facilities that conflict with the highway construction, as determined by the department, prior to the letting of the department's construction contract, and otherwise perform and complete the utility relocation in accordance with approved relocation plans and schedule of calendar days; provided, however, that the agreement may provide that, in the event that the department does not undertake the highway construction project within a specified time, the utility shall be reimbursed for the relocation work it has timely performed in accordance with the approved plans and schedule.(b) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the utility shall be responsible, at its own expense, to inspect all phases of the utility relocation to ensure that the removal, installation, or removal and installation of the utility facility is done in accordance with all applicable specifications and safety codes.(c) The cost of relocation for which a utility may be reimbursed under subsection (a) shall nevertheless be borne in full by the utility without reimbursement by the department where, if required by law, the utility does not have a valid permit to locate on the public highway right-of-way from the department or from the county or municipality having jurisdiction over the right-of-way.(d) The department shall make no reimbursement payment to a utility as authorized under subsection (a), unless and until the commissioner is satisfied that the relocation has been performed in accordance with the relocation plans and schedule of calendar days approved by the department.(e) To ensure that the department never pays any cost of relocation for which it cannot receive proportionate reimbursement under any federal aid highway act, if the United States department of transportation finally determines that the cost of relocation is not reimbursable to the department from federal funds, or that the cost of relocation is less than the amount reimbursed to the utility by the department, the utility so reimbursed shall repay to the department the difference between the amount reimbursed to the utility and the cost of relocation finally determined by the department.Impl. am. Acts 1959, ch. 9, § 3; Acts 1963, ch. 368, § 4; impl. am. Acts 1972, ch. 829, § 7; T.C.A., § 54-565; Acts 1984, ch. 817, § 1; 1999, ch. 450, § 5; 2003, ch. 86, § 2.