Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 3-501
Oklahoma Code Comment
Part 5 of current Article 3 essentially continues the provisions of Part 5 of pre-revision Article 3, but substantially rearranges them, omits a number of them because other provisions were changed for policy reasons or because they no longer represent a sufficient issue to deserve explicit rather than general treatment, and redrafts many of the provisions for clarity. The roadmap is as follows:
|
Part 5 also makes some changes in the law, although the basic rules remain unchanged. For example, the basic rule in Brannons No. Seven, Inc. v. Phelps, 665 P.2d 860 (Okla. Ct. App. 1983), that a holder is required to give notice of dishonor to an indorser before the indorser's liability is fixed, continues unchanged under Section 3-503 . The changes in Part 5 are:
(1) Electronic presentment is explicitly authorized under sub section 3-501(b)(1) . This will facilitate check truncation, where information from the check is sent forward electronically rather than the check itself, which is held within the banking system. See also Sections 4-110 and 4-406 and their Comments, and the Official Comment to this Section.
(2) With respect to notes payable at a definite time, a formal demand for payment as reminiscent of face-to-face dealings is no longer required for dishonor to precipitate indorser liability under sub section 3-502(a)(3) . See UCC § 3-502, Official Comments 2 and 3.
(3) Notice of dishonor is no longer relevant to a drawer's liability except where the draft is accepted by other than a bank (defined in sub section 3-103(c) and Section 4-105 as including a savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union or trust company). See UCC §§ 3-503(a) and 3-414(b), (c) and (d); § 3-414, Official Comments 2 and 4; and the Official Comments to UCC § 3-503.
(4) Sub section 3-503(c) increases the time to give notice of dishonor for a person other than a collecting bank to 30 calendar days, rather than the 3-business-day period in pre-revision sub section 3-508(2) . Note that while the same time for a collecting bank is retained, a depositary bank may have a longer time to charge back under Section 4-214 .
(5) Section 3-504 , on excused notice of dishonor, and sub section 3-502(f) are consistent with Reynolds-Wilson Lumber Co. v. Peoples National Bank, 699 P.2d 146 (Okra. 1985), which overruled Goodman v. Norman Bank of Commerce, 551 P.2d 661 (Okla. Ct. App. 1976). The latter case held that notice of dishonor was excused on a represented check.
(6) Protest is no longer required in any circumstance, and must be requested by the holder as any other service provided by the banking system. See the Official Comment to UCC § 3-505