Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-169
(1969, P.A. 828, S. 171; P.A. 73-639, S. 12; P.A. 74-338, S. 47, 94; P.A. 78-92, S. 2; P.A. 80-216, S. 2; P.A. 82-12; P.A. 84-236, S. 1; P.A. 85-506, S. 25, 32; P.A. 89-383, S. 2, 16; P.A. 98-39.)
Illegal confinement is no defense to escape from correctional institution. 169 Conn. 438. Cited. 184 Conn. 157. Held constitutional as to both due process and equal protection clauses of fourteenth amendment to U.S. Constitution. Id., 222. Defendant's acts did not constitute violation of statute as it was amended as of date of acts as he was not then under jurisdiction of Commissioner of Correction. 185 C. 517. Cited. 216 Conn. 402; 226 Conn. 497; 234 C. 301. Cited. 36 Conn.App. 440; 39 Conn.App. 333; Id., 407; Id., 789. Cited. 35 CS 544. Subsec. (a): Cited. 213 C. 38. Subdiv. (2): Proof of single failure to report insufficient to prove guilt of "escape". 216 Conn. 402. Subdiv. (2): Decision of Appellate Court in 35 CA 1 overruled to the extent that it permits conviction for escape to rest solely on jury's finding that defendant repeatedly did not report to supervising officer as scheduled. 234 Conn. 301. Cited. 235 Conn. 748; 236 C. 209; Id., 266; 241 Conn. 322. Cited. 29 CA 817; 35 CA 1; 36 Conn.App. 680; Id., 813, 815. Subdiv. (2) simply identifies another environment-a community residence-from which an unauthorized departure, or to which a failure to return, is possible and made culpable; escape is a general intent crime, and all that is necessary to prove the element of intent is that defendant have the general intent to perform the acts that constitute the offense. 121 CA 443. Subdiv. (3): Equating failure to return from parole with escape held not violative of constitutional right to due process and equal protection. 36 CS 71.
See Sec. 18-101a re consideration of prisoner's failure to return from furlough as crime of escape.