Conn. Gen. Stat. § 30-46
(1949 Rev., S. 4263; P.A. 73-533, S. 11; P.A. 74-307, S. 3, 8; P.A. 77-614, S. 165, 587, 610; P.A. 78-303, S. 80, 85, 136; P.A. 80-482, S. 4, 170, 191, 345, 348; P.A. 95-195 , S. 49 , 83 ; P.A. 97-175 , S. 5 ; P.A. 98-236 , S. 3 ; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, S. 146 (d); P.A. 04-169 , S. 17 ; 04-189 , S. 1 .)
Section constitutional. 133 C. 556 . Unsuitability of place not restricted to plot or structure. Id., 562. In determining number of outlets, commission may draw the line somewhere; and if it does so on sufficient evidence, its action not arbitrary or illegal. Id.; 134 C. 144 . Cited. Id., 292. The fact that commission had previously found premises suitable for a permit did not prevent it from later finding them unsuitable. 135 C. 713 . Permit does not attach as a right to any particular location; it is purely personal privilege. 137 C. 20 . Provides for discretionary refusal of permits by liquor control commission. 142 Conn. 569 . Permit refused where venture found probably not profitable. 144 C. 550 . In action for an injunction restraining defendant from using certain premises for the sale of liquor because of its proximity to a prior liquor outlet, the validity of the permit of such prior liquor outlet cannot be collaterally attacked. 148 Conn. 412 . Denial of permit in area where allowable and where there were no other outlets within two miles held an abuse of discretion; 146 C. 416 distinguished. 151 C. 362 . Determination of factual matters and a liberal discretion in determining suitability of the location of proposed liquor-permit premises, powers vested in liquor control commission. 164 C. 537 . Cited. 41 CA 83 . Cited. 5 CS 207 . Where commission reasoned that the "granting of another permit in this locale would be detrimental to the public interest", it was held to be an abuse of discretion. 14 Conn.Supp. 155 . If club's or association's charter prohibited intoxicating liquor, commission cannot grant permit. 15 CS 69 . Cited. 16 CS 301 . Subsec. (a): Subdiv. (3): Section rests liberal discretion in commission to determine suitability of location of proposed liquor-permit premises. 175 C. 295. Court cannot substitute its discretion for that of commission. Id., 409.