W. Va. Jud. Cond. 2.6
W. Va. Jud. Cond. 2.6
COMMENT
[1] The right to be heard is an essential component of a fair and impartial system of justice. Substantive rights of litigants can be protected only if procedures protecting the right to be heard are observed.
[2] The judge plays an important role in overseeing the settlement of disputes, but should be careful that efforts to further settlement do not undermine any party's right to be heard according to law. The judge should keep in mind the effect that the judge's participation in settlement discussions may have, not only on the judge's own views of the case, but also on the perceptions of the lawyers and the parties if the case remains with the judge after settlement efforts are unsuccessful. Among the factors that a judge should consider when deciding upon an appropriate settlement practice for a case are (1) whether the parties have requested or voluntarily consented to a certain level of participation by the judge in settlement discussions, (2) whether the parties and their counsel are relatively sophisticated in legal matters, (3) whether the case will be tried by the judge or a jury, (4) whether the parties participate with their counsel in settlement discussions, (5) whether any parties are unrepresented by counsel, (6) whether the matter is civil or criminal, and (7) whether the case is pending before a specialized tribunal, such as the Mass Litigation Panel or the Business Court Division.
Clerk's Notes on Rule 2.6
Rule 2.6 and its comment are based largely on the 2007 Model Rules, with the exception of factor (7) in Comment [2], which is specific to West Virginia. Comment [3] of the Model Rules was deleted.