Tenn. R. Crim. P. 49
Advisory Commission Comment.
This rule represents the commission's judgment on how best to accomplish service and filing, given the practicalities of practice and the necessity for meaningful compliance.
It is the public policy of the State of Tennessee to encourage recycling and the use of recycled products and materials. This policy is reflected in the Tennessee Solid Waste Planning and Recovery Act ((title 68, ch. 211, part 6) et seq.) and in the Solid Waste Management Act of 1991 ((title 68, ch. 211, part 8) et seq.). Rule 49(c)(3) supports the Court's policy of recommending and encouraging that all papers filed in the Tennessee courts be submitted on recycled paper.
Pro se litigants who are incarcerated in correctional facilities cannot ensure the timely mailing of their mail and, as a consequence, cannot control the timely filing of their legal papers. The pro se prisoner-filing provision in Rule 49(d) covers all papers required or permitted to be filed pursuant to the rules of criminal procedure. Should timeliness of filing become an issue, Rule 49(d)(3) places the burden on the incarcerated person to establish compliance with the deadline. The provision relative to filing with the appropriate correctional personnel is consistent with the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
Advisory Commission Comment [2022]
Rule 49(c) is amended by the addition of a new sub-paragraph (1) requiring that pleadings, motions, and other papers filed with the clerk shall identify the filing attorney or party, if unrepresented, and shall include the information identified in the amendment. Non-compliant filings are subject to being stricken by the court. The remaining sub-paragraphs have been renumbered.