Petitioner shall attach completed Form 4-960.2 NMRA (affirmation in support of expungement of records, upon release without conviction) or Form 4-960.3 NMRA (affirmation in support of expungement of records, upon conviction) to the notice of completion of briefing. If Form 4-960.2 or Form 4-960.3 contains information regarding arrests, charges without arrest, and/or convictions that occurred subsequent to the filing of the petition, the parties shall have twenty (20) days after service of the notice of completion of briefing and attachments thereto to file additional objections to the petition for expungement.
If the petition is filed under Section 29-3A-3 NMSA 1978 (expungement of records upon identity theft) or Section 29-3A-4 NMSA 1978 (expungement of records upon release without conviction) and no objections to the petition are filed, the court may decide the petition on the pleadings and affirmation (if applicable) without a hearing.
If the petition is filed under Section 29-3A-8 NMSA 1978, the court may decide the petition on the pleadings without a hearing.
If the petition is filed under Section 29-3A-5 NMSA 1978 (expungement of records upon conviction), the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether petitioner has established that the requirements of Section 29-3A-5(C) NMSA 1978have been met.
Any party wishing to participate in any hearing by telephonic or other electronic means, may do so by giving notice to the court and the other parties as provided for in the petition and objection forms. A motion and order for telephonic or electronic appearance shall not be required. The court may order any party to attend a hearing in-person.
N.M. R. Civ. P. Dist. Ct. 1-077.1
Committee Commentary.-
2021 Amendment to Rule 1-004 NMRA
The Supreme Court has concluded that in the context of proceedings under the Criminal Record Expungement Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 29-3A-1 to -9 (2019, as amended 2021), if the petitioner serves notice of the petition as required by Paragraph F of Rule 1-077.1 NMRA and subsequently affirms that service was made in accordance with this rule, see Form 4-955 NMRA (certificate of service, expungement of records upon release without conviction) or Form 4-956 NMRA (certificate of service, expungement of records upon conviction), such service satisfies the requirements of due process because the recipients of the notice must either file objections or file a "Notice of Non-Objection" before the district court holds a hearing pursuant to Section 29-3A-4(E) or Section 29-3A-5(C).
Section 29-3A-3(D) (expungement of records upon identity theft); due process issue
Section 29-3A-3(D) provides that "After notice to and a hearing for all interested parties and in compliance with all applicable law, the court shall insert in the records the correct name and other identifying information of the offender, if known or ascertainable, in lieu of the name of the person wrongly identified." Identity theft is a crime. See, e.g., NMSA 1978, § 30-16-24.1(2009) (theft of identity; obtaining identity by electronic fraud). It would be a violation of due process for the court in a civil proceeding to publicly declare that it found a person guilty of the crime of identity theft and to identify in public records the name and identifying information of the offender, particularly when the statute does not require notice of the proceeding be given to the alleged wrongdoer. For this reason, Rule 1-077.1 omits requirements related to the statutory provision quoted above.
Rule 1-077.1(G)
Rule 1-077.1(G) provides that parties entitled to notice of these proceedings must file and serve specific objections or a Notice of Non-Objection within sixty days of service of the petition. This time limit is contrary to Section 29-3A-4(B), which provides for a thirty-day response time for filing objections to a petition seeking expungement of records upon release without conviction. Rule 1-077.1(G) controls because the Supreme Court can modify a procedural provision in a statute by adopting a contrary rule. Lovelace Med. Ctr. v. Mendez, 1991-NMSC-002, ¶ 15, 111 N.M. 336, 805 P.2d 603 ("[L]egislative rules relating to pleading, practice and procedure in the courts, particularly where those rules relate to court management or housekeeping functions, may be modified by a subsequent rule promulgated by the Supreme Court.); see also id. ¶ 10 ("[T]here are good reasons for construing [statutory time limits] simply as the legislative adoption of a housekeeping rule to assist the courts with the management of their cases, [which] have effect unless and until waived by a court in a particular case or modified by a rule of this Court on the same subject.").
Rule 1-077.1(J)
Rule 1-077.1(J) provides that if no objections are filed, the district court may decide a petition for expungement of records upon identity theft, § 29-3A-3, or for expungement of records upon release without conviction, § 29-3A-4, without a hearing. This conflicts with Section 29-3A-3(B), which provides that the district court shall issue an order "after a hearing" on a petition for expungement of records upon identity theft and with Section 29-3A-4(E), which provides likewise in the context of a petition for expungement of records upon release without conviction. Rule 1-077.1(J) controls because the Supreme Court can modify a procedural provision in a statute by adopting a contrary rule. Lovelace Med. Ctr., 1991 -NMSC-002, ¶ 15 ("[L]egislative rules relating to pleading, practice and procedure in the courts, particularly where those rules relate to court management or housekeeping functions, may be modified by a subsequent rule promulgated by the Supreme Court.).
Rule 1-077.1(K)
Rule 1-077.1(K) provides that the district court shall issue an order within sixty (60) days of an expungement hearing. This time limit is contrary to Section 29-3A-4(E) and Section 29-3A-5(C), which require the district court to issue an order within thirty (30) days of certain expungement hearings. For the reasons stated above in the committee commentary to Rule 1-077.1(G), the time limits in Rule 1-077.1(K) control.
Provisionally adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 21-8300-033, effective for all cases pending 15 or filed on or after January 28, 2021.