Rule 17 - Challenge for Cause(a) In both civil and criminal cases the parties shall make all challenges for cause before the jury is sworn to try the case, or upon a showing of good cause for the delay, before the jury retires to deliberate. The court shall sustain a challenge for cause if the prospective juror: (1) is disqualified under rule 5; (2) served as a juror in that same county within the previous three hundred sixty-five (365) days in a case that resulted in a verdict; (3) will be unable to comprehend the evidence and the instructions of the court due to any reason including defective sight or hearing, or inadequate English language communication skills; (4) has formed or expressed an opinion about the outcome of the case, and is unable to set that opinion aside and render an impartial verdict based upon the law and the evidence; (5) was a member of a jury that previously considered the same dispute involving one or more of the same parties; (6) is related within the fifth degree to the parties, their attorneys, or any witness subpoenaed in the case; (7) has a personal interest in the result of the trial; (8) is biased or prejudiced for or against a party to the case; or (9) is a person who has been subpoenaed in good faith as a witness in the case. (b) In criminal cases the court shall sustain a challenge for cause if the prospective juror: (1) was a member of the grand jury that issued the indictment; (2) is a defendant in a pending criminal case; (3) in a case in which the death penalty is sought, is not qualified to serve in a death penalty case under law; or (4) has formed or expressed an opinion about the outcome of the case which appears to be founded upon a. a conversation with a witness to the transaction; b. reading or hearing witness testimony or a report of witness testimony. (c) In civil cases the court shall sustain a challenge for cause if the prospective juror is interested in another suit, begun or contemplated, involving the same or a similar matter.