Del. R. Evid. 202
Comment
This rule is new and does not appear in the F.R.E. or U.R.E. The material has been covered in the past by 10 Del. C. §§4305, 4307, 4308, 4312, 4313 and 4314, which should now be repealed since the provisions of those sections are covered by these rules. It is intended that this rule shall expand and make easier the introduction of evidence of the Constitution, statutes, common law and case law of this State, of the United States and of other states, countries and jurisdictions.
It is the intention of this rule to encourage the admissibility of evidence of law rather than to discourage it. The only limitation imposed is that notice of the law of other jurisdictions sought to be relied upon should be given to all parties at a reasonable time.
This rule provides that the courts of this State shall take judicial notice, with or without request, of the statutory, common and case law of this State and the constitutional law of the United States. Judicial notice of the law of the United States and other jurisdictions of the United States may also be taken. It is based on 10 Del. C. §4313(a) and the Uniform Judicial Notice of Foreign Law Act.
Rule 202(d) is based on old U.R.E. 9(2) and New Jersey Evidence Rule 9(2)(3).
Rule 202(e) is based on Delaware Court of Chancery Rule 44.1 and Delaware Superior Court Civil Rule 44.1.
See Rule 902 for other methods of introducing documentary evidence.
D.R.E. 202 was amended in 2017 in response to the 2011 restyling of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The amendment is intended to be stylistic only. The pre-2017 "Comment" to D.R.E. 202 was revised only as necessary to reflect the 2017 amendments. There is no intent to change any result in ruling on evidence admissibility.