Rule 613 - Prior Inconsistent Statements- Bias and Interest of Witnesses(a)General Rule. Prior statements of a witness inconsistent with the testimony of the witness at a trial, hearing or deposition, and evidence of bias or interest on the part of a witness are admissible for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of a witness.(b)Foundation Requirement. Before extrinsic evidence of a prior contradictory statement or of bias or interest may be admitted, the examiner shall lay a foundation for impeachment by affording the witness the opportunity, while testifying, to explain or deny any prior statement, or to admit, deny, or explain any bias or interest, except as provided in subdivision (b) (1) of this rule.(1) The court shall permit witnesses to be recalled for the purpose of laying a foundation for impeachment if satisfied that failure to lay a foundation earlier was not intentional, or if intentional was for good cause; even if no foundation is laid, an inconsistent statement may be admitted in the interests of justice.(2) In examining a witness concerning a prior statement made by the witness, whether written or not, the statement need not be shown nor its contents disclosed to the witness at that time, but on request the same shall be shown or disclosed to opposing counsel.Added by SCO 364 effective 8/1/1979; amended by SCO 1153 effective 7/15/1994; by SCO 1269 effective 7/15/1997; and by SCO 1522 effective 10/15/2003 In 1996, the legislature enacted AS 12.61.127, which provides that statements obtained from victims or witnesses in violation of AS 12.61.120 or 12.61.125 are presumed inadmissible. According to § 79 ch. 64 SLA 1996, this statute has the effect of amending Evidence Rule 613 relating to impeachment of witnesses.