Ala. R. Evid. 503A
Advisory Committee's Notes
While the psychotherapist-patient privilege of Rule 503 is based generally upon a preexisting Alabama statute, it nevertheless represents a nationally recognized privilege principle. Such a privilege is expressed in the evidence rules of virtually every state that has adopted rules of evidence based upon either the Federal Rules of Evidence or the Uniform Rules of Evidence. In contrast, however, the Rule 503A counselor-client privilege, created largely by combining two preexisting Alabama statutes, is generally not found in the primary body of evidence law nationally. The committee takes no position as to the merits of those statutes. Rather, their provisions are incorporated into the Alabama Rules of Evidence based upon a continuing philosophy that greater trial competency will result if, wherever feasible, external statutory rules of evidence are merged into these rules.
Rule 503A may be interpreted to include all licensed counselors who provide counseling services; however, its foundation lies in two separate statutes of a more specific applicability. The first is that statute creating, at least in criminal proceedings, a privilege for communications between the victim of sexual assault or family violence and a victim counselor. Ala. Code 1975, §§ 15-23-40 to -46. The second, and the one of broader application, is that statute creating a privilege for communications, in all types of cases, between a licensed counselor or counselor associate and a client. Ala. Code 1975, §§ 34-8A-1 to -21. Rule 503A is intended to supersede these preexisting statutes, except as might otherwise be expressly provided.
It should be noted that there basically are two types of persons whose counseling may be brought within the present privilege. First, there is the licensed professional counselor or the counselor associate, both of whom are either licensed or certified by the Alabama Board of Examiners in Counseling and who provide a broad range of counseling services. Second, there is the employee or supervised volunteer who provides counseling for any emotional or psychological condition resulting from a sexual assault or family violence. The field of operation for this privilege is broader for the first of these two groups. For example, the privilege arising in regard to communications with a victim counselor can generally be asserted only in a criminal case. If the victim counselor happens also to qualify as a licensed professional counselor or as a counselor associate, however, then the privilege could be asserted even in a civil case.
Subsection (a)(1). Definition of "client." A client is anyone who consults either a licensed professional counselor or a certified counselor associate for the rendition of professional counseling services. See Ala. Code 1975, § 34-8A-21. Additionally, the term "client" includes a person who consults a victim counselor for assistance in overcoming adverse emotional or psychological effects of a sexual assault or family violence. See Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-41(2).
Subsection (a)(2). Definition of "licensed professional counselor." The definition of "licensed professional counselor" is taken from the statute upon which the privilege is based. See Ala. Code 1975, § 34-8A-2(1). See also Ala. Code 1975, § 34-8A-7 (containing the statutory requirements for obtaining a professional counselor's license). The statutory language limiting this privilege to those who render professional counseling services in private practice "for a fee" is abandoned.
Subsection (a)(3). Definition of "confidential." The major variation in language made during the conversion of this privilege from statutory to rule form is in the definition of "confidential" as applied to communications. This is a change in form, rather than substance, and is intended to make the language in Rule 503A conform to the language found in other rules creating privileges, particularly the rule dealing with the psychotherapist-patient privilege. Compare Ala.R.Evid. 503(a)(3). Whether a communication is confidential largely constitutes a question of intent, to be measured by the objective facts. If it is intended that the communication be disclosed to third parties, then generally there is no privilege. Communication in the presence of a known third party, for example, generally destroys the privilege, because in that situation it is generally apparent that no confidentiality was intended. Rule 503A provides, however, that the presence of a third party does not destroy the privilege if disclosure to that person is necessary to the client-counselor communication.
As it is in regard to other privileges, the term "communication" is to be broadly interpreted. Consistent with the preexisting statute applicable to the victim-counselor privilege, the Rule 503A privilege extends to preclude the production of records when they concern confidential communications. See Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-42(a).
Subsection (a)(4). Definition of "counselor associate." The counselor associate is included, along with the licensed professional counselor, within the purview of the present privilege. The definition is taken from the preexisting statute. Ala. Code 1975, § 34-8A-2(2). In addition to being appropriately certified by the Board of Examiners in Counseling, the counselor associate must be acting under the supervision of a licensed professional counselor.
Subsection (a)(5). Definition of "counseling services." The privilege arises when the client consults with the counselor for the delivery of counseling services as part of the practice of counseling. See Ala. Code 1975, § 34-8A-2(4).
Subsection (a)(6). Definition of "practice of counseling." The "practice of counseling" includes, but is not limited to, those methods and procedures of counseling listed in the rule. This list of illustrations is taken directly from the statute upon which the privilege is based. Ala. Code 1975, § 34-8A-2(5). Included within the term is counseling victims "for any emotional or psychological condition resulting from a sexual assault or family violence." Compare Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-41(8).
Under the original statute upon which Rule 503A is based, the privilege applicable to licensed professional counselors and counselor associates was limited to those in the private practice of counseling, i.e., those rendering counseling services in private practice, for a fee, monetary or otherwise. Ala. Code 1975, § 34-8A-2(5). Rule 503A discontinues that limitation.
Subsection (a)(7). Definition of "victim counselor." This definition is taken from the statute upon which those provisions of Rule 503A relating to victim counselors are based. Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-41(8). This particular capacity arises only as to counseling for an emotional or psychological condition resulting from sexual assault or family violence.
Subsection (a)(8). Definition of "sexual assault." This definition conforms completely to that found in the predecessor statute that originally created the victim-counselor privilege. See Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-41(3).
Subsection (a)(9). Definition of "family violence." This definition is taken from the statutory language upon which the present privilege is based. See Ala. Code 1975, § 15-2341(4).
Subsection (a)(10). Definition of "family or household members." This term, which limits those against whom family violence may be committed, retains its preexisting statutory definition. See Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-41(5).
Subsection (a)(11). Definition of "victim counseling center." This definition, taken from statutory language, serves to modify the victim-counselor segment of the Rule 503A privilege. See Ala. Code 1975, § 14-23-41(7).
Section (b). General rule of privilege. The language used to state the counselor-client privilege is similar to that used to state other privileges. Compare Ala.R.Evid. 503. This is consistent with the legislative mandate that the counselor-client privilege is to be placed upon the same basis as the attorney-client privilege. See Ala. Code 1975, § 34-8A-21. No privilege arises, of course, unless the counselor is consulted in his or her capacity as a provider of counseling services. Additionally, the privilege applies only to communications that are confidential.
Like other rules dealing with privileges, Rule 503A is written so as to preclude any assertion of the third-party eavesdropper rule, created at common law, under which a third-party eavesdropper generally could relate any privileged conversation the eavesdropper had overheard. Compare Ala.R.Evid. 503(b). This result is accomplished by use of the words "to prevent any other person from disclosing."
Section (c). Who may claim the privilege. This privilege belongs to the person who sought the counseling. This means that it may be asserted by the client (or victim) or the client's legal representative. Additionally, the counselor may assert the privilege on behalf of the client or victim.
As a general rule, the privilege does not belong to the counselor. There is no question that this is true with regard to licensed professional counselors and counselor associates, because they are treated, for purposes of privilege, as attorneys are treated. Ala. Code 1975, § 34-8A-21. Compare Ala.R.Evid. 502(c). The preexisting statute regarding victim counselors, however, contained language indicating that the counselor held an independent right to assert the privilege. See Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-42(a). Rule 503A does not incorporate that language, in order to be consistent with all other rules setting out privileges; however, it makes one exception. That exception is that in no case may the victim counselor be required to provide testimony that would disclose the name, address, location, or telephone number of a safe house, abuse shelter, or other facility, providing temporary emergency shelter to the victim of the offense or transaction that is the subject of the civil or criminal proceeding, unless the facility is a party to the proceeding. See Ala.R.Evid. 503A(d)(5).
Section (d). Exceptions.
Subsection (1). Proceedings for hospitalization. Communications relevant to an issue in commitment proceedings do not fall within the protection of the present privilege if the licensed professional counselor or counselor associate has determined that hospitalization is needed. Compare Ala.R.Evid. 503(d)(1). This exception would be unnecessary with regard to victim counselors, because no privilege regarding them may be asserted in civil cases. See Ala.R.Evid. 503A(d)(5). Compare Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-42.
Subsection (2). Examination by order of court. No privilege attaches to communications made during a court-ordered examination of a client's mental or emotional condition. The scope of the exception, however, is limited generally to communications relevant to the particular purpose for which the judge ordered the examination. This exception is consistent with a similar exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege. See Ala.R.Evid. 503(d)(2). It is envisioned, of course, that this exception rarely would be needed in the context of the victim counselor who is a nonprofessional employee or volunteer; this is because the court customarily would not order an examination by such a person. Additionally, one should remember that this Rule 503A privilege, as it relates to victim counselors, generally has no application in civil cases.
Subsection (3). When the client's condition is an element of a claim or a defense. In any proceeding in which the client relies upon his or her mental or emotional condition, as an element of either a claim or a defense, the privilege does not protect communications that are relevant to that condition. See Harbin v. Harbin, 495 So.2d 72 (Ala.Civ.App.1986) (holding that the psychologist-patient privilege is not applicable to protect communications that are relevant to show a party's mental state in a custody case).
No need for this exception will arise in civil cases, in regard to victim counselors who do not qualify as either licensed professional counselors or certified counselor associates. This is because the privilege applies to communications made to such persons only when the communications are offered in a criminal case. See Ala.R.Evid. 503A(d)(4). Compare Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-42.
Subsection (4). Breach of duty arising out of the counselor-client relationship. No privilege arises as to communications relevant to litigation in which the client sues the counselor for breach of duty or in which the counselor sues the client. This exception is similar to that found in the rule setting out the psychotherapist-patient privilege. See Ala.R.Evid. 503(d)(4). No such exception is expressly set out in the statute originally creating the counselor-client privilege; however, that statute does provide that the privilege is to be treated on a par with the attorney-client privilege and this latter privilege contains such an exception. See Ala.R.Evid. 502(d)(3). The victim counselor statute, which is the basis for recognizing the present privilege regarding victim counseling, in criminal cases, does contain an exception of this nature. The statute provides:
"[I]f a victim brings suit against a victim counselor or the agency, business, or organization in which the victim counselor was employed or served as a volunteer at the time of the counseling relationship and the suit alleges malpractice during the counseling relationship, the victim counselor may testify or produce records regarding confidential communications with the victim and is not liable for doing so." Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-43(b).
Subsection (5). Victim counseling in civil cases. This exception carries forward the preexisting statutory provision that the victim-counselor privilege does not apply in civil cases except as it might preclude the victim or counselor from divulging information as to the location of an emergency victim-services facility. See Ala. Code 1975, § 15-23-42. If the victim counselor qualifies as either a licensed professional counselor or a certified counselor associate, then this exception would not apply; accordingly, the confidential communications with the client/victim would be privileged in both civil and criminal cases.
[Advisory Committee's Notes amended, eff. 1-30-2020.]
Advisory Committee's Notes to Amendment to Advisory Committee's Notes to Rule 503A(d)(3)
Effective January 30, 2020
The second and third sentences of the original Advisory Committee's Notes to Rule 503A(d)(3), upon the adoption of Rule 503A in 1996, read: "This exception is identical to an exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege. See Ala. R. Evid. § 503(d)(3)." Those two sentences have been deleted from the Advisory Committee's Notes because those sentences should not have been published with the final version of Rule 503A that became effective on January 1, 1996. That reference was to an earlier draft of Rule 503; the final version of Rule 503 (effective on January 1, 1996) does not contain the provision that was numbered as 503(d)(3) in earlier drafts of Rule 503. Those sentences have been deleted from the Notes in order to prevent confusion.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending the Advisory Committee's Notes to Rule 503A and Rule 803 and amending Rule 803(16), and adopting Advisory Committee's Notes to those amendments, and adopting Rule 902(13) and Rule 902(14) and Advisory Committee's Notes to those rules, effective January 30, 2020, are published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So.3d.