Note: Paragraphs (b) and (c) reflect federal requirements under 40 CFR s. 131.10(g), pertaining to highest attainable uses, and 40 CFR s. 131.3(e), specifying November 28, 1975 as the benchmark date from which to determine "existing uses" for aquatic life.
Note: Examples of waterbodies with distinct natural characteristics are wetland-dominated streams, naturally acidic bog lakes, and ephemeral streams with only small areas of short-term refugia. Biological condition assessments should not be conducted during periods when there is insufficient water due to natural conditions to support aquatic life.
Wis. Admin. Code Department of Natural Resources NR 102.55
An example of methods the department uses for assessing biological health of surface waters are those found in the department's guidance for waterbody assessments, "Wisconsin Consolidated Assessment and Listing Methodology," or WisCALM. Protocols for assessing attainment of biological assessment thresholds using metrics such as fish or macroinvertebrate indices of biotic integrity or the macrophyte assessment of condition are contained in, or referenced in, WisCALM. WisCALM is available on the department's surface water assessment website at https:/ https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/SurfaceWater/assessments.htmland is updated every 2 years with public input.