The provisions of this rule and rule 5122-26-16.1 of the Administrative Code are not applicable to forensic restrictions imposed by correction and law enforcement authorities for security (non-clinical care) purposes. The use of restraint or seclusion by correction, law enforcement or other staff for the purposes of clinical care is subject to the provisions of this rule.
A provider which prohibits the use of seclusion and restraint will develop a policy stating such.
The goal of reducing and minimizing the use of seclusion and restraint is one that will be shared and articulated by the provider's leadership. The elevation of oversight by leadership of each use of seclusion or restraint in order to investigate causality, ascertain relevancy of current policies and procedures, and identify any associated workforce development issues, is core to the successful achievement of this goal.
Seclusion and restraint are intrusive techniques to be used by trained, qualified staff as a last resort in order to control dangerous and potentially harmful behaviors and to preserve safety. Best practices include careful early assessment of a person's history, experiences, preferences, and the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of past exposure to these methods. Best practices will be based on understanding and consideration of the individual's history of traumatic experiences as a means to gain insight into origins and patterns of the individual's actions.
Use of seclusion or restraint will be subject to performance improvement processes in order to identify ways in which the use of these methods can be decreased or avoided and more positive, relevant and less potentially dangerous techniques used in their place.
When individuals experience repeated or sustained use of these methods, leadership should evaluate all causative factors and consider alternative treatment interventions and possible transfer to or placement in a more structured treatment setting with the capacity to meet individual needs with reduced exposure to these intrusive interventions.
The presence of weaponry in an agency poses potential hazards, both physical and psychological, to clients, staff and visitors. Utilization by the agency of non-agency employed armed law enforcement personnel (e.g., local police) to respond to and control psychiatric crisis situations, will be minimized to the extent possible; and
Staff will be trained and demonstrate competency before participating in any seclusion or restraint intervention.
The plan will be based on the initial behavioral health assessment, and will include and be implemented, as feasible, in the following order:
Replaces: 5122-26-16
Ohio Admin. Code 5122-26-16
Five Year Review (FYR) Dates: 10/20/2028
Promulgated Under: 119.03
Statutory Authority: 5119.36
Rule Amplifies: 5119.36
Prior Effective Dates: 01/01/1991, 04/16/2001, 01/01/2012, 04/01/2016, 10/31/2019