Provided however, where the sum of the amounts described in such clauses (a) and (b) of such subparagraph exceeds the fair market value of the real property as of the date of conveyance, such consideration shall be the fair market value of the real property plus the amount described in such clause (c) of such subparagraph as the aggregate amount of debt cancelled, assumed or taken subject to in connection with the conveyance is limited to the fair market value of the real property. For purposes of this subdivision, a debt is recourse debt to the extent that, as of the date of conveyance, the grantor or a person related to the grantor including any guarantor, bears the economic risk of loss for the debt beyond any loss attributable to the value of the property securing the debt.
Example 1:
Bank A made a nonrecourse loan of $10 million to individual X secured by a mortgage on New York State real property owned by X. X also provided a personal recourse guarantee of the last $1 million of the debt, that is, if the value of the mortgaged real property decreased to less than $10 million X would be obligated to pay the difference between $10 million and the value of the mortgaged real property to Bank A up to a maximum amount of $1 million. X defaulted on the loan. The real property was conveyed to Bank A in lieu of foreclosure and, at the time of the conveyance, the real property had a fair market value of $8 million. As a result of the conveyance the $9 million nonrecourse component of the loan is discharged. Simultaneously, Bank A discharged X from any obligation under the personal guarantee. The consideration for the conveyance consists only of the $9 million nonrecourse component of the loan that was discharged, as no part of the excess $1 million personal obligation can be satisfied by the conveyance of the real property.
Example 2:
Same facts as Example 1, except that instead of the personal guarantee being on the last $1 million, X guaranteed the first $1 million i.e., X would be liable for any deficiency only if the mortgaged real property was worth less than $1 million. Since the fair market value of the real property at the time of the conveyance was $8 million, there was no continuing recourse exposure to X, and therefore the consideration for the conveyance is equal to $10 million, which was the full amount of the nonrecourse indebtedness discharged as a result of the conveyance of the real property.
Debt that was originally nonrecourse and which was converted to recourse debt will be so treated as recourse debt provided that the conversion to recourse debt and the conveyance of the real property are not, in substance, integrated steps or part of a plan to decrease the consideration for the conveyance so as to decrease the tax for the conveyance.
Provided however, in the case where the amounts described in clauses (a) and (b) of this subparagraph involve recourse debt only and the higher of such amounts exceeds the fair market value of the real property at the time of the conveyance, then the consideration is equal to the fair market value or the real property as of the date of conveyance, since the aggregate amount of the debt cancelled, assumed or taken subject to in connection with the conveyance is limited to the fair market value of the real property.
For the purposes of this paragraph and paragraphs (2), (15) and (16) of this subdivision a grantee is related to the mortgagee or lienor to the extent that the mere change of identity or form of ownership exemption provided at section 1405 (b)(6) of the Tax Law would apply to a conveyance by the mortgagee or lienor to the grantee.
Provided however, where the higher of the amounts described in subclauses (iii)(a)(1) and (2) of this paragraph exceeds the fair market value of the real property multiplied by the percentage which represents the mortgagee's or lienor's beneficial ownership interest in the grantee, then such portion of consideration as described in such clause (a) is equal to the fair market value of the real property multiplied by such percentage since the aggregate amount of the debt cancelled, assumed or taken subject to in connection with the conveyance is limited to the fair market value of the real property multiplied by such percentage. (See subparagraph [2][ii] of this subdivision for further information on recourse debt.)
Provided however, where the sum of the amount described in clauses (a) and (b) of such subparagraph exceeds the fair market value of the shares of stock in the cooperative housing corporation and/or associated proprietary lease(s) as of the date of the conveyance, consideration shall be the fair market value of the shares of stock in the cooperative housing corporation and/or associated proprietary lease(s) being conveyed, plus the amounts described in such clauses (c) and (d) of such subparagraph. (See subparagraph [2][ii] of this subdivision for further information on recourse debt.)
Example 1:
A is the owner of 30 shares of stock in a cooperative housing corporation related to a proprietary lease of a commercial unit. The 30 shares represent five percent of the total number of shares in the cooperative housing corporation. The building of the cooperative housing corporation is encumbered by the lien of a mortgage having a current unpaid balance of $2,500,000. A's 30 shares have a fair market value of $1,200,000. A pledged its 30 shares to C as security for a loan of $1,600,000. The debt owed by A to C is nonrecourse indebtedness. The current unpaid balance of the debt is $1,740,000, including accrued interest. C is presently enforcing its security interest against A's shares of stock in the cooperative housing corporation. The consideration for the resulting conveyance is computed as follows:
Unpaid balance of debt | $1,740,000 |
Pro-rata portion of mortgage indebtedness ($2,500,000 * 5%) | + 125,000 |
Consideration for conveyance | $1,865,000 |
Example 2:
Same facts as in example 1, except that the debt owed from A to C is recourse indebtedness. The fair market value of A's shares of stock in the cooperative housing corporation is less than the sum of the unpaid balance of the debt ($1,740,000). The consideration for the resulting conveyance is computed as follows:
Fair market value of the cooperative shares | $1,200,000 |
Pro rata portion of mortgage indebtedness ($2,500,000 * 5%) | + 125,000 |
Consideration for conveyance | $1,325,000 |
Example 3:
X is the owner of 100 percent of the voting stock in Y Corporation. Y Corporation's only asset is a parcel of real property located in New York State. The fair market value of the real property is $2,000,000. The real property is encumbered by the lien of a mortgage having a current unpaid balance of $1,500,000, held by B Bank. X pledged 60 percent of its Y voting stock to Z as security for a debt of $400,000. The current unpaid balance of the debt is $450,000, including accrued interest. Z is presently enforcing its security interest in the voting stock of X. Z's enforcement of its security interest in the voting stock of X results in both a transfer and acquisition of a controlling interest. The consideration for the conveyance is computed as follows:
(a) Unpaid balance of debt | $450,000 |
Pro rata portion of mortgage indebtedness ($1,500,000 * 60) | + 900,000 |
Total, | $1,350,000 |
(b) FMV of real property-$2,000,000 * 60%=$1,200,000* |
* The amount computed in (b) ($1,200,000) is the consideration for the conveyance as it is less then the amount computed in (a) ($1,350,000).
Example 4:
S is the owner of 100 percent of the voting stock of K Corporation. K's assets consist of a parcel of real property located in New York State and other tangible assets. The fair market value of the parcel of real property is $2,100,000 and the fair market value of the other assets is $300,000. The real property is encumbered by the lien of a mortgage having a current unpaid balance of $700,000. Also, K Corporation has other debts totaling $300,000. S pledged 60 percent of its voting stock to J as security for a debt of $500,000. The current unpaid balance of the debt owed to J is $550,000, including accrued interest. J is presently enforcing its security interest in the voting stock owned by S. J's enforcement of its security interest in the voting stock of S results in both a transfer and an acquisition of a controlling interest. The consideration for the conveyance is computed as follows: Reasonable apportionment based on fair market value of assets owned by K Corporation:
(a) Unpaid balance of debt | $550,000 |
Part of mortgage indebtedness includible in amount to be apportioned ($700,000 * 60%) | 420,000 |
Part of other debt of entity includible in amount to be apportioned (300,000 * 60%) | + 180,000 |
Amount to be apportioned | $1,150,000 |
Reasonable apportionment based on fair market value of assets owned by K Corporation:
$1,150,000 * $2,100,000/$2,400,000 = $1,006,250*
(b) FMV of real property- $2,100,000 * 60%= $1,260,000 |
* The amount computed in (a) ($1,006,250) is the consideration for the conveyance as it is less than the amount computed in (b) ($1,260,000).
Footnotes
* The amount computed in (b) ($1,200,000) is the consideration for the conveyance as it is less then the amount computed in (a) ($1,350,000).
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 20 § 575.11