Tax Law, §§ 1105(a), 1110, 1111(g), 1115(a)(6), 1118(2), (3), (7), (9) and (10)
The sales and use tax treatment of the receipts from the retail sale or use of a racehorse is unique in certain transactions.
The mere possession of a license by any person (not otherwise a resident) which is not accompanied by one or more other activities will not result in resident status.
Example 1:
On August 2, 1985, a racehorse is purchased at Saratoga Flat Track by placing a claim of $15,000 before the start of the claiming race. This horse had not been sold during 1985 through a claiming race conducted in New York State prior to the second of August. Sales tax is due on the total purchase price.
Example 2:
A claim of $21,000 was placed for the purchase of a racehorse at Belmont Racetrack on June 3, 1985, before the start of a claiming race. The horse had been bought through a claiming race at Belmont Racetrack on April 30, 1985 for the purchase price of $19,000. Sales tax is due on the full purchase price of each transaction, since the amendment to the Tax Law did not take effect until July 1, 1985. If both transactions had taken place after July 1, 1985, sales tax would have been due on $19,000 (the amount of the first purchase) and on $2,000 (the difference between $19,000 and the higher purchase price of $21,000) in respect to the second purchase.
Example 3:
A claim of $14,000 was placed for the purchase of a racehorse at Aqueduct Racetrack on November 30, 1985, before the start of a claiming race. The horse had been purchased through a claiming race at Churchill Downs in Kentucky on July 6, 1985. New York sales tax is due on the full $14,000 purchase price at the New York claiming race without reduction since the previous sale was not at a claiming race held in New York State.
Example 4:
A claim of $17,000 was placed on the purchase of a racehorse entered in a claiming race at Roosevelt Raceway on July 4, 1986. The same horse had been purchased through a claiming race at the Syracuse Fair Grounds on September 11, 1985 for $15,000. Sales tax is due on the full $15,000 purchase price paid in 1985 and on the full $17,000 purchase price paid in 1986, since the two purchases were not within the same calendar year.
Example 5:
During the same calendar year a racehorse was sold in claiming races at Roosevelt Raceway for $10,000 in July, at Saratoga Raceway for $15,000 in August and at Monticello Raceway for $25,000 in September. Tax is due on the full $10,000 purchase price for the Roosevelt Raceway sale. On the Saratoga Raceway sale, tax is due on $5,000, which is the excess of the sales price paid on the Saratoga Raceway sale over the Roosevelt Raceway sale. On the Monticello Raceway sale, tax is due on $10,000 which is the amount the Monticello Raceway sale exceeded the highest price paid in any prior claiming race within New York State during the same calendar year.
Example 6:
During the same calendar year a racehorse was sold in claiming races at Roosevelt Raceway for $27,000 in July, at Saratoga Raceway for $20,000 in August and at Monticello Raceway for $18,200 in September. Tax is due on the full $27,000 purchase price for the Roosevelt Raceway sale. Since the purchase prices of the subsequent sales in the same calendar year did not exceed the first purchase price, no additional tax is due on the subsequent sales.
Example 7:
During the same calendar year a racehorse was sold in claiming races for $25,000 at Saratoga Raceway on the 10th of August, at the Syracuse Fair Grounds for $20,000 on the 31st of August and at Yonkers Raceway for $30,000 in September. Sales tax is due on the full $25,000 purchase price for the Saratoga Raceway sale. No sales tax is due on the purchase price of $20,000 paid at the Syracuse Fair Grounds as the purchase price paid on the second sale did not exceed the first purchase price. Sales tax is due on $5,000 which is the amount the third purchase price ($30,000) exceeds the highest previous purchase price ($25,000) subject to the tax at any claiming race held within New York State during the calendar year.
Example 8:
A nonresident, Mr. Ajax, who previously was not licensed and did not race or train horses or otherwise engage in business within New York State applies for and receives a license to race in New York State for the current calendar year. The license covers the period of January 1st through December 31st but Mr. Ajax does not participate in any activities preparatory to racing until January 10th of the current year. Mr. Ajax is not considered to be a resident of New York State for racing purposes until January 10th of the current year. Mr. Ajax made out of state purchases of racehorses during the current calendar year. The first purchase was made on the 2nd of January and the second purchase was made on the 23rd of January. Subsequently the two horses were brought into and raced in racing events in New York State on eight days each. Since Mr. Ajax was not a resident of New York State at the time of purchase of the first racehorse on the 2nd of January, Mr. Ajax does not owe any use tax when the first horse is brought into and raced in New York State. As Mr. Ajax was a resident of New York State at the time of purchase of the second horse on the 23rd of January and the horse was entered into racing events in New York State on more than five days in the calendar year, Mr. Ajax owes a compensating use tax on the first $100,000 of the value of the horse (the purchase price or current market value not to exceed cost) when the horse is entered into a racing event on the sixth day.
Example 9:
Mr. Collins, while engaged in racing activities in New York State, made an out of state purchase of a racehorse which was shipped into New York State and entered into racing events within six months of the date of purchase. During a two-month period within the calendar year, the racehorse was entered into racing events on three days and then shipped back out of state for the rest of the calendar year. As the racehorse was not entered into racing events on more than five days in the calendar year, Mr. Collins does not owe a compensating use tax on the value of the racehorse. In the subsequent calendar year the racehorse was brought back into New York State and entered into racing events on 10 days. Upon entering the racehorse in a racing event on the sixth day Mr. Collins owes a compensating use tax on the first $100,000 of the value of the racehorse. As the racehorse was used in New York State within six months of the date of purchase for racing events in the first calendar year, the compensating use tax due is computed on the consideration paid for the purchase of the horse (the tax is not imposed upon the amount of such sum that exceeds $100,000).
Example 10:
Mr. Jones, while engaged in racing activities in Yonkers, New York (8 1/4 percent combined State, MCTD and local tax rate) purchases a racehorse in Maryland. The following week the horse is brought into New York State and entered into racing events at the Saratoga Raceway (7 percent combined State and Saratoga County tax rate). Upon entering the horse in racing events on more than five days in that same calendar year at the Saratoga Raceway, a compensating use tax becomes due only at the 4 percent State tax rate since Mr. Jones was a resident of New York State but not a resident of Saratoga because at the time of purchase Mr. Jones was engaged in business activities within the State but was not engaged in such activities within Saratoga County.
Example 11:
In addition to racing in the events described in Example 10, the racehorse is shipped from Saratoga and entered into one racing event at Roosevelt Raceway (8 percent combined State, MCTD and county tax rate). An additional tax at the 1/4 percent tax rate for the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation District is not due as the horse was not entered in racing events on more than five days at the Roosevelt Raceway. The additional tax at the 3 3/4 tax rate for the County of Nassau is not due (regardless of the number of racing events entered) as Mr. Jones was not a resident of Nassau County at the time of purchase.
Example 12:
In addition to racing in the events described in Examples 10 and 11, the racehorse is shipped from Roosevelt Raceway to be entered in two racing events at Yonkers Raceway (8 1/4 percent combined State, MCTD and county tax rate). Although Mr. Jones was a resident of New York State and Yonkers at the time of purchase, at this time Mr. Jones does not owe an additional compensating use tax since the horse was not entered in racing events on more than five days in this locality. The additional tax at the 1/4 percent rate for the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation District is due after the horse is entered into a racing event at Yonkers Raceway for the fifth day, since the horse having entered one race at Roosevelt Raceway, will have at that time entered into racing events on more than five days within such district. Only after the horse is entered into a racing event at Yonkers Raceway for the sixth day will Mr. Jones owe an additional compensating use tax of 4 percent for the local tax rate in effect in that jurisdiction.
Example 13:
A person engaged in racing activities in Saratoga purchases a racehorse in another state and pays sales tax at the rate of five percent to the other state on the purchase price of $200,000 for a total tax paid of $10,000. The other state's law has a reciprocal provision allowing a credit for New York State and/or local taxes paid similar to the credit allowed under New York State law. Subsequently, within six months, the person transports the horse into New York State and enters the horse in racing events at Saratoga which is a taxing jurisdiction that has an effective New York State and local sales and use tax rate of seven percent. Upon the horse being entered in racing events in Saratoga on more than five days in the same calendar year, a compensating use tax becomes due at the tax rate of seven percent on $100,000 (the maximum taxable amount in this transaction) resulting in use tax due in the amount of $7,000. The person is entitled to claim a credit of $5,000 ($100,000 × 5 percent) against the $7,000 use tax due, thereby reducing the amount of use tax owed to $2,000. The remaining $5,000 tax paid to the other state as a result of the higher tax base is not allowed to be used as a credit against the use tax due within New York State.
Example 14:
Assume the same facts as Example 13 except $70,000 was paid for the purchase of the racehorse. In such a case, the person can claim the total $3,500 tax paid to the other state ($70,000 × 5 percent) as a credit against the New York State and local compensating use taxes due of $4,900 ($70,000 × 7 percent), leaving New York State and local use taxes due of $1,400.
Example 15:
A person engaged in racing activities in New York State purchases a racehorse in another state and pays the sales tax at the five percent rate in effect in the other state on a purchase price of $70,000 for a total tax paid of $3,500. The five percent tax rate in that other state includes a three percent state tax rate and a two percent local tax rate. The other state has a reciprocal provision which allows a credit for the New York State sales and use tax but does not allow credit for the sales and use tax imposed in the local taxing jurisdictions in New York State. The New York State and local use tax due is $4,900 ($70,000 × 7 percent) less a credit for the other state tax paid of $2,100 ($70,000 × 3 percent), resulting in a New York State and local use tax owed in the amount of $2,800. No credit is allowed for the local tax paid to the other state since such state does not allow a similar credit for New York's local sales and use taxes.
Cross-reference:
For definition of resident, see paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of this section.
Cross-reference:
For definition of resident, see paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of this section.
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 20 § 527.14