The above criteria are general standards and the corporation's field personnel must be trained to exercise discretion, sound judgment and common sense in ascertaining whether a serious impairment to human health exists. Doubts should be resolved in favor of continued service.
The corporation may exercise its own discretion with respect to terminating service to the customer in the event it does not receive an oral or written report from the local social services commissioner within 15 business days after the written referral of the matter by the corporation to the commissioner.
Comment:If a utility discovers a meter tampering or theft situation and determines that a serious impairment exists, it should continue service, pending DSS review, provided that service can be rendered safely. For example, if a utility discovers that the meter of a "locked account" is advancing, it should, in most circumstances, be able to continue service in a safe manner. In other theft cases, particularly those involving gas service, the need for rendering the condition safe may preclude the continuation of service. For example, if a gas utility discovers unsafe piping, an unsafe meter bypass or substantial damage to the meter, termination may be the best method of eliminating the unsafe condition. If the utility cannot readily repair the unsafe condition or, in the case of a gas company, cannot obtain access to the pilot lights (which would have to be relit), immediate restoration of service would not be practical. The utility should specifically note, in its referrals to DSS, those cases where heat-related service is not restored or continued so that DSS may give immediate attention to them.
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 16 § 143.12