Except as otherwise provided in § 1.472-1 with respect to raw material computations, with respect to retail inventory computations, and with respect to other methods of computation established to the satisfaction of the Commissioner as reasonably adapted to the purpose and intent of section 472, and in § 1.472-8 with respect to the "dollar-value" method, the adoption and use of the LIFO inventory method is subject to the following requirements:
January | 1 at | $0.11= | $0.11 |
April | 2 at | .12= | .24 |
July | 3 at | .13= | .39 |
October | 4 at | .14= | .56 |
Totals | 10 | 1.30 |
and that it has a 1957 closing inventory of 15 units. This closing inventory, depending upon the taxpayer's method of valuing inventory increases, will be computed as follows:
10 at | $0.10 | $1.00 | |
October | 4 at | .14 | .56 |
July | 1 at | .13 | .13 |
Totals | 15 | 1.69 |
10 at | $0.10 | $1.00 | |
January | 1 at | .11 | .11 |
April | 2 at | .12 | .24 |
July | 2 at | .13 | .26 |
Totals | 15 | 1.61 |
or
10 at | $0.10 | $1.00 | |
(130/10) | 5 at | .13 | .65 |
Totals | 15 | 1.65 |
Suppose that the taxpayer's closing inventory for 1958, the year following that involved in Example 1 of this subdivision, reflects an inventory decrease for the year, and not an increase; suppose that there is, accordingly, a 1958 closing inventory of 13 units. Inasmuch as the decreased closing inventory will be determined wholly by reference to the 15 units reflected in the opening inventory for the year, and will be taken "in the order of acquisition" pursuant to section 472 (b) (1), and inasmuch as the character of the taxpayer's opening inventory for 1958 will be dependent upon its method of valuing its 5-unit inventory increase for 1957, the closing inventory for 1958 will be computed as follows:
From 1956 | 10 at | $0.10 | $1.00 |
July 1957 | 1 at | .13 | .13 |
October 1957 | 2 at | .14 | .28 |
Totals | 13 | 1.41 |
or
From 1956 | 10 at | $0.10 | $1.00 |
January 1957 | 51 at | .11 | .11 |
April 1957 | 2 at | .12 | .24 |
Totals | 13 | 1.35 |
or
From 1956 | 10 at | $0.10 | $1.00 |
From 1957 | 3 at | .13 | .39 |
Totals | 13 | 1.39 |
For example, a restatement of cost of goods sold based on an inventory method other than LIFO is considered to be clearly identified as supplemental or explanatory information if the supplement or appendix containing the restatement contains a general statement that all information based on such inventory method is reported in the appendix or supplement as a supplement to or explanation of the taxpayer's primary presentation of income, profit, or loss as reported on the face of the taxpayer's income statement.
However, a disclosure of income, profit, or loss using an inventory method other than LIFO is not considered at variance with the requirement of paragraph (e)(1) of this section if the disclosure is made in the form of either a footnote to the balance sheet or a parenthetical disclosure on the face of the balance sheet. In addition, an income disclosure is not considered at variance with the requirement of paragraph (e)(1) of this section if the disclosure is made on the face of a supplemental balance sheet labelled as a supplement to the taxpayer's primary presentation of financial position, but only if, consistent with the rules of paragraph (e)(3) of this section, such a disclosure is clearly identified as a supplement to or explanation of the taxpayer's primary presentation of financial income as reported on the face of the taxpayer's income statement.
26 C.F.R. §1.472-2