TRICARE; Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS); Payments for Professional Services in Low-Access Locations

AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, DOD.

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

This final rule implements 10 U.S.C. 1097b(a), as added by section 716 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 which allows higher provider reimbursement rates than normally allowable, with certain limitations, when necessary to ensure an adequate TRICARE Prime network of qualified providers. This final rule also implements 10 U.S.c. 1079(h)(5), as added by section 747 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, to remedy circumstances in which TRICARE beneficiaries face very severe limitations on access to needed health care services.

EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 27, 2001.

ADDRESSES:

TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), Program Operations Directorate, 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810, Falls Church, VA 22041-3206.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Mike Talisnik, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)/TRICARE Management Activity, telephone (703) 681-0064 or Mr. Stan Regensberg, telephone (303) 676-3742.

Questions regarding payment of specific claims under the CHAMPUS allowable charge method should be addressed to the appropriate TRICARE/CHAMPUS contractor.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on TRICARE and CHAMPUS Payments to Providers

The relationship of DoD payment levels to Medicare's for institutional and professional health care services is central to the ongoing success of TRICARE. Payment levels have significant effects on DoD's ability to implement managed care programs, to assure beneficiary access to the full spectrum of health services, and to do this in a cost-effective manner.

Legislative initiatives have linked DoD's payment rates for health care to Medicare, beginning in the early 1980s, with the initial focus on institutional services. Similar initiatives in the late 1980s linked DoD's payment levels for professional services to Medicare.

A key principle of DoD's efforts in the linkage of reimbursement rates to Medicare has been the protection of access to services. In a 1996 report to Congress, it was found that 86 percent of the time providers accepted the TRICARE payment limits called CMACs (CHAMPUS Maximum Allowable Charges) as payment in full. Most recently, that percentage has increased to over 94 percent acceptance. However, the very high rate of acceptance overall may hide the access problems in certain localities.

When the CMAC payment approach was implemented in 1992, national payment levels were adjusted to reflect local economic conditions in over 200 localities, the same as those used by Medicare. Since that time, the number of localities has been reduced to fewer than 100, with the introduction of more and more statewide payment localities.

In 1999, DoD undertook revisions to one statewide locality, Alaska, in recognition of the differences in acceptability of TRICARE payments in Anchorage compared to the rest of the state. Overall, CMAC's are accepted as full payment over 90 percent of the time in Alaska; however, the vast majority of services are provided in Anchorage, so that severe access problems elsewhere in the state are hidden. In an effort to increase acceptability of TRICARE payment rates outside of Anchorage, DoD created a new locality, including all of Alaska except Anchorage. While this action addressed one locality, DoD's current regulatory authority may not be sufficient in some other localities. Accordingly, this final rule provides for the mechanism to increase access to health care providers for TRICARE beneficiaries where access to health care services is severely impaired or where there is an inadequate number of qualified network providers.

II. Overview of the Rule

This final rule would add a new § 199.14(h)(1)(iv)(D) authorizing the establishing of higher payment rates for specific services than would otherwise be allowable, if it is determined that access to health care services is severely impaired. Payment rates could be established through addition of a percentage factor to an otherwise applicable payment amount, or by calculating a prevailing charge, or by using another governmental payment rate. Higher payment rates could be applied to all similar services performed in a locality, or a new locality could be defined for application of the higher payment rates.

Other factors in determining the authority to establish a higher payment shall be based on the number of providers in a locality, the number of providers who are TRICARE participating providers, the number of eligible beneficiaries in the locality, and the availability of Military Treatment Facility providers.

The final rule would also add a new § 199.14(h)(1)(iv)(E) allowing the reimbursement of higher payment rates for health care services for services that would otherwise be allowable, if it is determined necessary to ensure adequate Preferred Provider networks. The amount of reimbursement for health care services would be limited to the lesser of: (1) An amount equal to the local fee for service charge in the area where the service is provided; or (2) 115 percent of the otherwise allowable TRICARE rate for the service. The higher rate will be authorized only if all reasonable efforts have been exhausted in attempting to create an adequate network and that it is cost-effective and appropriate to pay the higher rate to ensure an appropriate mix of primary care and specialists in the network.

We have also added to the final rule a new definition of “Director” to clear up any confusion associated with continued use in the CHAMPUS/TRICARE regulation to “Director, OCHAMPUS.” The TRICARE Management Activity (TMA) has replaced the old Office of CHAMPUS, and the Director of TMA exercises the authorities previously exercised by the Director, OCHAMPUS.

III. Review of Comments

The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on May 30, 2000 (65 FR 34423). We received one comment from a managed care support contractor who felt that rate adjustments should be available in rural and/or medically under-served areas that are non TRICARE Prime areas.

Response: The Department recognizes the need to ensure that access to health care is protected in areas that are medically underserved or in rural areas where there are few providers available. This final rule establishes new mechanisms to identify and address locations where access to care is severely impaired.

IV. Rulemaking Procedures

Section 801 of title 5, United States Code, and Executive Order 12866 requires certain regulatory assessments and procedures for any major rule or significant regulatory action, defined as one which would result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or have other substantial impacts.

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that each Federal agency prepare, and make available for public comment, a regulatory flexibility analysis when the agency issues a regulation which would have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.

This is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 801. It is a significant regulatory action but not economically significant under E. O. 12866, and it would not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. In addition, the final rule will not impose additional information collection requirements on the public under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 55).

This rule is being issued as a final rule.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199

• Claims
• Fraud
• Health care
• Health insurance
• Individuals with disabilities
• Military personnel

Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is amended as follows:

PART 199—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 199 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter 55.

2. Section 199.2 is amended by revising the definition of “Director, OCHAMPUS” and adding the definition of “Director” in alphabetical order to read as follows:

3. Section 199.14 is amended by adding new paragraphs (h)(1)(iv)(D) and (E) to read as follows: