Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

Download PDF
Federal RegisterOct 15, 2010
75 Fed. Reg. 63509 (Oct. 15, 2010)

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of September 27, 2010 through October 1, 2010.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and

(3) One of the following must be satisfied:

(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased;

(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased;

(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased;

(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and

(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) One of the following must be satisfied:

(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;

(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and

(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either—

(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.

(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in—

(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1);

(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or

(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));

(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the date on which—

(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or

(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and

(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers' firm within—

(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
73,874 The Wise Company, Inc. (B&M Seating) Memphis, TN April 6, 2009.
73,877 L.A. Najarian, Inc Greene, NY March 29, 2009.
74,020 The Electric Materials Company, Subsidiary of United Stars North East, PA April 12, 2009.
74,349 Belding Hausman, Inc., Weldon Mill, Leased Workers from Compensation Management Emporia, VA June 28, 2009.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
73,621 Thermo Fisher Hamilton, Subsidiary of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lab Works Stations Division Two Rivers, WI March 2, 2009.
74,272 Medtronic, Inc., Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management, Leased Workers of Advantage Technical, etc Mounds View, MN June 21, 2009.
74,337 Certegy Check Services, Inc., Fidelity National Payment Services, Leased Workers from Appleone West Valley City, UT June 30, 2009.
74,385 Mermec, Inc., FKA ImageMap, Inc., Leased Worker from Modis, Inc Columbia, SC July 13, 2009.
74,464 BreconRidge Manufacturing Solutions, Sanmina-SCI Corporation, Leased Workers from Kelly Services and Penski Ogdensburg, NY July 29, 2009.
74,467 Zach System Corporation, Zach System SPA, Leased Workers of Turner Industries and Go La Porte, TX August 3, 2009.
74,491 Acme Electric, Actuant Corporation, Leased Workers From Mega Force Staffing Lumberton, NC August 15, 2010.
74,504 American Girl Brands, LLC, Subsidiary of Mattel, Inc Middleton, WI August 6, 2009.
74,517 Hotels.Com, An Expedia, Inc. Company, Latam Arlington, TX July 31, 2009.
74,556 Telair International, Incorporated, Nordisk Aviation Products Division Simi Valley, CA July 20, 2009.
74,567 Janssen R&D and Janssen Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Divisions of J&J Springhouse, PA August 24, 2009.
74,580 Fiskars Brands, Inc., Garden Division, On-Site Leased Workers of QTI Sauk City, WI August 31, 2009.
74,580A Fiskars Brands, Inc., School, Office and Craft Division, On-Site Leased Workers of Manpower Wausau, WI August 31, 2009.
74,585 Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC Grenada, MS August 26, 2009.
74,606 Watson Laboratories, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Danbury Pharmacal, Leased Workers Adecco Staffing Carmel, NY September 3, 2009.
74,621 Burgess-Norton Manufacturing Company, Inc., Leased Workers from Selectremedy and Manpower Claremore, OK September 10, 2009.
74,657 STMicroelectronics, Inc Phoenix, AZ October 31, 2010.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
72,947 Supreme Foam, Inc Archdale, NC November 17, 2008.
74,425 Douglas Corporation, Leased Workers Masterson Personnel, Just in Case, etc Eden Prairie, MN July 22, 2009.
74,471 Alumax Service Center, Division of SAPA Extrusions, Leased Workers of Manpower Temporary Riverside, MO July 15, 2009.
74,592 Interstate Electronics Corp., L-3 Communications, Leased Workers of Bently Global Resources, etc Anaheim, CA August 31, 2009.
74,600 Lear Corporation Louisville, KY September 3, 2009.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
74,569 Titus Transportation, LP Denton, TX August 24, 2009

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified.

The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
73,846 AT&T Operations, Inc., Network Management Center Boulder, CO
74,191 Pennsylvania Railcar—Plant #2, dba Railcar Services Company West Middlesex, PA
74,506 Acxiom CDC Corporation Chicago, IL

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
74,564 Ally Financial Incorporated, Motor Acceptance Corp. (GMAC), Auctioneering Unit, Darlington Auto Auction Darlington, SC

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
72,765 Mount Vernon Consulting, LLC, Workers' Wages Were Reported Under 14 W. Administrative Services, Agora, Inc Baltimore, MD
73,395 Roddie Trucking, LLC, SWR, Inc. San Angelo, TX
73,972 Saint Barnabas Health Care System, Patient Accounting Dept., Leased Workers, Liberty and Tritech Ocean Port, NJ
74,040 Cemex Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC, Wampum Cement Plant Wampum, PA
74,136 Parker Paint Company Beaverton, OR
74,320 United Steelworkers Local 746L Tyler, TX
74,528 United Auto Workers Local 2166, UAW Shreveport, LA

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
74,248 EDS, an HP Company (Re-Branded as HP—Enterprise Services), Virtual Workers Across the United States Palo Alto, CA
74,343 JohnsonDiversey Santa Cruz, CA

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
74,603 Thermo EGS Gauging, Inc., Field Service Engineers Wilmington, MA

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of September 27, 2010 through October 1, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department's Web site at http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations.

Dated: October 8, 2010.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-26014 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P