Membership of State Banking Institutions in the Federal Reserve System: Financial Subsidiaries

AGENCY:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

The Board has adopted a final rule implementing the financial subsidiary provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act for state member banks. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act authorizes state member banks that comply with the requirements of the rule to control, or hold an interest in, a financial subsidiary which may conduct certain financial activities that are not permissible for the parent bank to conduct directly. The final rule is substantially similar to the interim rule that the Board adopted in March 2000.

DATES:

The final rule is effective on September 17, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kieran J. Fallon, Senior Counsel (202/452-5270), Michael J. O'Rourke, Counsel (202/452-3288), Legal Division; Betsy Cross, Deputy Associate Director (202/452-2574), Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Section 121 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act) (Pub. L. 106-102; 113 Stat. 1373-82) authorizes qualifying state member banks to own or control a new type of subsidiary—referred to as a financial subsidiary. A financial subsidiary may engage in activities that have been determined to be financial in nature or incidental to financial activities under the GLB Act, including general insurance agency activities in any location and travel agency activities. In addition, a financial subsidiary may engage in underwriting, dealing in and making a market in all types of securities—activities previously prohibited for subsidiaries of state member banks by the Glass-Steagall Act. A financial subsidiary of a state member bank also may conduct any activity that the bank is permitted to conduct directly.

The GLB Act prohibits financial subsidiaries from engaging in certain types of activities. As a general matter, a financial subsidiary may not engage as principal in underwriting insurance, providing or issuing annuities, real estate development or real estate investment, and merchant banking and insurance company investment activities.

In March 2000, the Board adopted and requested comment on an interim rule that implemented the financial subsidiary provisions of the GLB Act for state member banks (65 FR 14810). The interim rule set forth the criteria that a state member bank and its depository institution affiliates must meet for the bank to own or control a financial subsidiary; the activities that a financial subsidiary may and may not conduct; the procedures that a state member bank must follow to establish a financial subsidiary; and the procedures and restrictions that would apply if a state member bank or any of its depository institution affiliates ceased to continue to meet the requirements of the rule. The interim rule paralleled the rule adopted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) governing financial subsidiaries of national banks. (See 65 FR 12905.)

The Board received three comments from the public on the interim rule, each of which was submitted by a trade association for the banking industry. All commenters supported the interim rule and one commenter noted that the interim rule was conveniently formatted and easy to understand. Commenters also asked that the Board modify the rule in minor respects or address issues suggested by the commenter. For example, one commenter suggested that the Board make available a list of the newly authorized financial activities that may be conducted by a financial subsidiary. Another commenter requested that the Board further streamline the 15-day prior notice process established by the interim rule for obtaining the Federal Reserve System's approval to establish a financial subsidiary or commence a new financial activity through an existing financial subsidiary.

In addition, one commenter urged the Board and the other Federal banking agencies to closely monitor financial subsidiaries of banks to ensure that these newly authorized entities do not threaten the safety and soundness of affiliated depository institutions. Another commenter asserted that the Board should allow a state member bank that has received a less-than-satisfactory management rating or rating under the Community Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.) (CRA) to request that a follow-up examination occur expeditiously and, thereby, permit the bank the opportunity to quickly restore its compliance with the rule's criteria.

The Board has carefully reviewed the comments received on the interim rule. As described further below, the Board has modified certain provisions of the interim rule in light of these comments and the Federal Reserve System's experience in administering the interim rule since March 2000. The final rule remains substantially similar to the Board's interim rule and the financial subsidiary rule adopted by the OCC.

Description of Final Rule

The final rule, like the interim rule, permits qualifying state member banks to control, or hold an interest in, a new type of subsidiary, referred to as a “financial subsidiary.” A financial subsidiary is defined as any company that is controlled by one or more insured depository institutions, but does not include (1) a subsidiary that the state member bank is specifically authorized to hold by the express terms of a Federal statute (other than section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act), such as an Edge Act subsidiary held under section 25 of the Federal Reserve Act, or (2) a subsidiary that engages only in activities that the parent bank may conduct directly and that are conducted on the same terms and conditions that govern the conduct of the activity by the state member bank. As discussed further below, a financial subsidiary of a bank may only engage in activities permissible for the parent bank and certain other financial activities. The final rule clarifies that a financial subsidiary includes any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries.

The authority for a state member bank to own or control a financial subsidiary is in addition to the existing authority of state member banks to establish operations subsidiaries, which are subsidiaries that engage only in activities that the parent bank may conduct directly and that are conducted on the same terms and conditions that govern the conduct of these activities by the bank. See 12 CFR 250.141. State member banks may continue to retain and establish new operations subsidiaries permitted under state law and the Board's interpretations without complying with the requirements of this rule.

Section 208.71—What Are the Requirements To Invest in or Control a Financial Subsidiary?

Under the GLB Act, a state member bank may control, or hold an interest in, a financial subsidiary only if certain criteria are met. Section 208.71 of the rule sets forth these criteria.

Capital and Management Requirements

First, the state member bank and each of its depository institution affiliates must be well capitalized and well managed. An insured depository institution is well capitalized if it meets or exceeds the capital levels designated as “well capitalized” by the institution's appropriate Federal banking agency under section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831o) (FDI Act). The final rule provides that an uninsured depository institution will be considered “well capitalized” if it has and maintains at least the capital levels its appropriate Federal banking agency has established under section 38 of the FDI Act for an insured depository institution to be well capitalized.

Well managed is defined by reference to the achievement of specific examination ratings. The FDI Act allows the appropriate Federal banking agency for a depository institution to use an examination conducted by a state banking agency in lieu of a Federal examination if the state examination meets the criteria set forth in section 10(d) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)). Accordingly, the final rule allows a depository institution to be deemed “well managed” on the basis of a qualifying state examination. The final rule continues to provide that a depository institution that has not been examined will be considered well managed if its appropriate Federal banking agency determines that the institution's managerial resources are satisfactory.

In the course of administering the interim rule, questions have arisen concerning whether a well managed depository institution would retain its well managed status if it merged with another depository institution. The final rule clarifies that a depository institution that results from the merger of two or more well managed depository institutions will be considered well managed unless the appropriate Federal banking agency for the resulting institution determines otherwise. However, where a merger involves an institution that is not well managed, the managerial status of the combined organization likely will depend on the facts and circumstances of the particular case. Accordingly, the final rule provides that a depository institution resulting from the merger of a well managed institution with an institution that is not well managed or that has not been examined will be considered well managed if the appropriate Federal banking agency determines that the resulting institution is well managed.

Asset Limitation

Under the GLB Act and the rule, the aggregate consolidated total assets of the bank's financial subsidiaries may not exceed the lesser of 45 percent of the bank's consolidated total assets or $50 billion. The GLB Act requires the Board and the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a mechanism for indexing the $50 billion limit.

Debt Rating or Alternative Requirement for Large Banks

If the state member bank is one of the largest 100 insured banks, the bank must have at least one issue of outstanding eligible debt that is currently rated in one of the three highest investment grade rating categories by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Eligible debt refers to unsecured debt that has an initial maturity of more than 360 days. The debt must be issued and outstanding, may not be supported by any form of credit enhancement, and may not be held in whole or in any significant part by affiliates or insiders of the bank or by any other person acting on behalf of or with funds from the bank or an affiliate.

If the state member bank is one of the second 50 largest insured banks, the GLB Act allows the bank to meet this debt rating requirement or an alternative criteria established jointly by the Board and the Secretary of the Treasury by regulation. The final rule includes the alternative criteria established by the Board and the Secretary of the Treasury (see 66 FR 8748). A bank meets this alternative criteria if the bank has a current long-term issuer credit rating (as defined in § 208.77(f) of the rule) from at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization that is within the three highest investment grade rating categories used by the organization. The debt rating and alternative criteria do not apply to a large bank if its financial subsidiaries do not engage in any newly authorized financial activity as principal.

Notice to Federal Reserve

Finally, the state member bank must obtain the Federal Reserve's approval to acquire control of, or an interest in, the financial subsidiary using the streamlined notice procedures set forth in § 208.76 of the rule. The state member bank also must obtain any necessary approvals from its state supervisory authority.

Section 208.72—What Activities May a Financial Subsidiary Conduct?

A financial subsidiary of a state member bank may conduct only three types of activities.

First, a financial subsidiary may engage in activities that section 4(k)(4) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (BHC Act) defines by statute to be financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity and permissible for a financial holding company. These activities are listed in § 225.86(a), (b) and (c) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.86(a), (b) and (c)) and include securities underwriting and dealing, selling insurance as agent, and operating a travel agency in connection with the offering of other financial services.

Second, a financial subsidiary may engage in activities that the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Board, determines to be financial in nature or incidental to financial activities and permissible for financial subsidiaries of national banks pursuant to section 5136A(b) of the Revised Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C. 24a(b)). These activities currently are listed in 12 CFR 1501.2 of the Treasury Department's rules.

Third, a financial subsidiary of a state member bank may engage in activities that the bank is permitted to engage in directly, subject to the same terms and conditions that govern the conduct of the activity by the state member bank.

As required by the GLB Act, the rule prohibits a financial subsidiary of a state member bank from engaging as principal in insurance underwriting (except to the extent permitted under state law and the GLB Act), providing or issuing annuities, real estate investment or development (except to the extent expressly authorized by applicable state and Federal law), and merchant banking and insurance company investment activities permitted for financial holding companies under sections 4(k)(4)(H) or (I) of the BHC Act.

As noted above, one commenter requested that the Board make available a list of the financial activities that a financial subsidiary may conduct. The Board expects to issue shortly a list of the newly authorized financial activities permissible for a financial subsidiary. This list, which may be obtained from the Reserve Banks, will not identify activities that a state member bank may be permitted to engage in directly and that would, therefore, also be permissible for a financial subsidiary of the bank.

Section 208.73—What Additional Restrictions Are Applicable to State Member Banks With Financial Subsidiaries?

The GLB Act requires that a state member bank that owns or controls a financial subsidiary comply with a number of prudential safeguards. Section 208.73 of the rule implements these requirements.

For purposes of determining its compliance with all applicable regulatory capital standards, the state member bank must “de-consolidate” the assets and liabilities of its financial subsidiaries from those of the bank and then deduct the aggregate amount of its equity investment (including retained earnings) in all financial subsidiaries from the bank's capital and assets. The final rule clarifies how to make the capital adjustments required by the GLB Act. Specifically, the bank must deduct (i) 50 percent of the aggregate amount of its equity investment (including retained earnings) in all financial subsidiaries from both the bank's Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital for purposes of determining its risk-based capital ratios, (ii) 50 percent of the aggregate amount of its equity investment (including retained earnings) in all financial subsidiaries from the bank's Tier 1 capital for purposes of determining its leverage ratio, and (iii) 100 percent of the aggregate amount of its equity investment (including retained earnings) in all financial subsidiaries from its tangible equity for purposes of determining its tangible equity capital ratio. In addition, the bank must deduct the entire amount of its equity investment (including retained earnings) in all financial subsidiaries from the bank's risk-weighted assets, average total assets and total assets for purposes of determining its risk-based, leverage and tangible capital ratios, respectively.

The bank must meet all applicable capital requirements—including the well capitalized requirement of § 208.71 and the capital levels established by the Board under section 38 of the FDI Act—after these adjustments. In addition, although the GLB Act requires a bank to “de-consolidate” the assets and liabilities of any financial subsidiary for regulatory capital purposes, a financial subsidiary remains a subsidiary of a state member bank and the Board will continue to review the operations and financial and managerial resources of the bank on a consolidated basis as part of the supervisory process. The Board may take appropriate supervisory action if the Board believes that the bank, either on a fully consolidated basis or on a basis that de-consolidates the bank's financial subsidiaries, does not have the appropriate financial and managerial resources (including capital resources and risk management controls) to conduct its direct or indirect activities in a safe and sound manner.

The rule also requires that the state member bank establish and maintain policies and procedures to manage the financial and operational risks arising from its ownership of a financial subsidiary and preserve the bank's separate corporate identity. A financial subsidiary also is considered a subsidiary of a bank holding company (and not a subsidiary of a bank) for purposes of the anti-tying prohibitions of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970.

In addition, the rule specifies that a financial subsidiary of a state member bank is considered an affiliate (and not a subsidiary) of the bank for purposes of sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, and includes the GLB Act's special provisions governing the application of section 23A to investments in, and extensions of credit to, a financial subsidiary. The Board recently requested comment on a new rule (Regulation W) that would implement all aspects of sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, including the provisions of sections 23A and 23B that relate to financial subsidiaries of banks. Proposed Regulation W addresses, among other things, the definition of a “financial subsidiary” for purposes of sections 23A and 23B, how to value a bank's investment in a financial subsidiary for purposes of section 23A, and when extensions of credit by an affiliate of a state member bank to a financial subsidiary of the bank will be considered an extension of credit by the bank itself under the GLB Act's special anti-evasion rules applicable to financial subsidiaries. The Board may make modifications to this rule as appropriate in connection with the adoption of a final Regulation W.

Section 208.74—What Happens If the State Member Bank or a Depository Institution Affiliate Fails To Continue To Meet Certain Requirements?

The Board will give notice to a state member bank that owns or controls a financial subsidiary if the Board finds that the state member bank or any of its depository institution affiliates fails to continue to be well capitalized and well managed, that the assets of the bank's financial subsidiaries exceed the asset limitation imposed on financial subsidiaries, or that the state member bank has failed to comply with the operational safeguards required by the rule.

To assist the Board in enforcing the requirements of the GLB Act, the final rule continues to require that a state member bank notify the appropriate Reserve Bank if the bank becomes aware that any of its depository institution affiliates has ceased to be well capitalized and well managed. The final rule provides that the bank must submit this notice within 15 calendar days of becoming aware of the change in the affiliate's capital or managerial status, and that the notice must identify the relevant depository institution affiliate and the area(s) of noncompliance.

If a state member bank receives a notice from the Board that it is not in compliance with the rule's requirements, the bank must execute an agreement with the Board to bring itself back into compliance with the requirements of the rule. The agreement must explain the actions the bank will take to correct the areas of noncompliance and when such actions will be taken and provide any other information the Board may require. If the notice relates to a depository institution affiliate, the affiliate must execute an agreement with its appropriate Federal banking agency to restore itself to well capitalized and well managed status. The Board and the appropriate Federal banking agency may impose conditions on the direct or indirect activities of the state member bank or depository institution affiliate, respectively, until the institution restores its compliance with the rule's requirements. If the deficiencies are not corrected within 180 days (or such longer period as the Board may permit), the Board may require the state member bank to divest its financial subsidiaries.

If a state member bank that is one of the largest 100 insured banks fails to continue to meet the debt rating requirement or alternative criteria of § 208.71(b), if applicable, the state member bank may not acquire any additional equity capital (including debt qualifying as capital) of the financial subsidiary until the bank once again meets these requirements.

Section 208.75—What Happens if the State Member Bank or Any of Its Insured Depository Institution Affiliates Receives Less Than a “Satisfactory” CRA Rating?

The GLB Act requires the Board to prohibit a state member bank from acquiring control of a financial subsidiary, or commencing any additional activity or acquiring control of any company through an existing financial subsidiary, if the bank or any insured depository institution affiliate has received less than a “satisfactory” rating from its appropriate Federal banking agency at its most recent examination under the CRA. Section 208.75 includes these prohibitions. The rule clarifies that, if this prohibition is in effect, the financial subsidiary may not acquire control of another company by acquiring substantially all of the assets of the company. The rule also provides that any prohibition under § 208.75 does not affect the ability of a financial subsidiary to commence any additional activity, or acquire control of a company engaged only in activities, that the state member bank is permitted to engage in directly. The terms of the GLB Act require the Board to apply the prohibitions in § 208.75 if the state member bank “or any of its insured depository institution affiliates has received in its most recent examination under the [CRA] a rating of less than ‘satisfactory record of meeting community credit needs’.” The Board recently considered how a parallel provision in the GLB Act should apply to a financial holding company that acquires an insured depository institution with a less-than-satisfactory CRA rating. The Board concluded, based on the Act's language and purposes, that the activity prohibitions would apply to a financial holding company only when an insured depository institution receives a less-than-satisfactory CRA rating while it is a subsidiary of the financial holding company. For the same reasons discussed in that rulemaking, the Board believes that the parallel restrictions in the GLB Act and § 208.75 concerning financial subsidiaries apply only if the state member bank has a less-than-satisfactory CRA rating or an insured depository affiliate of the bank receives a less-than-satisfactory CRA rating while it is an affiliate of the state member bank. If a state member bank becomes affiliated with an insured depository institution that, at the time of the affiliation, has a less-than-satisfactory CRA rating, the institution must achieve at least a “satisfactory” CRA rating in its first CRA examination after becoming affiliated with the state member bank or the prohibitions in § 208.75 would apply to the state member bank and its financial subsidiaries.

The GLB Act's CRA prohibitions apply only if the state member bank or any of its insured depository institution affiliates has received less than a “satisfactory” CRA rating at its most recent examination under the CRA. Accordingly, the CRA rating requirement does not apply to special purpose banks that are not subject to CRA examination under the Federal banking agencies' CRA regulations, or to de novo insured depository institutions that have not yet received (and are not the successor of an institution that has received) a CRA rating.

One commenter recommended that the Board allow a state member bank that has received a less-than-satisfactory management or CRA rating to request that a follow-up examination occur on an expedited basis. For many banks, the Board's rules and procedures already provide for a shorter safety and soundness and CRA examination cycle if the bank has received a less-than-satisfactory rating. In addition, a Reserve Bank may, on request, move forward the scheduled date of a bank's next examination where such action is appropriate and consistent with available resources.

Section 208.76—What Federal Reserve Approvals Are Necessary for Financial Subsidiaries?

The final rule retains the streamlined notice procedures included in the interim rule for state member banks to engage in newly authorized financial activities through a financial subsidiary. A state member bank must file a notice with the appropriate Reserve Bank prior to acquiring control of, or an interest in, a financial subsidiary, or engaging in an additional financial activity through an existing financial subsidiary. A notice is not required for a financial subsidiary to engage in an additional activity that the parent state member bank is permitted to conduct directly. The notice must provide basic information on the financial subsidiary and its existing and proposed activities and include a certification that the state member bank and its depository institution affiliates meet the requirements of the GLB Act and the rule. The final rule also provides that a notice must provide the capital ratios for the bank and its depository institution affiliates. The Board has found that the capital data available to a banking organization at times differs from the data available to the Board, and that requiring the filing organization to include this data in a notice assists in ensuring that the organization meets the relevant capital levels required by statute.

If the notice relates to the initial affiliation of the state member bank with a company engaged in insurance activities, the notice also must describe the company's insurance activities and identify the states where the company holds an insurance license. The Board will use this information in fulfilling its obligations to consult with the relevant state insurance authorities under section 307(c) of the GLB Act (15 U.S.C. 6716(c)).

The rule provides that a notice will be deemed approved on the fifteenth day after receipt by the appropriate Reserve Bank of an informationally complete submission unless, prior to that time, the notice is disapproved or the bank is notified that additional time to review the notice is needed. In addition, the appropriate Reserve Bank may approve the notice prior to the expiration of the 15-day period by informing the bank in writing of such action. For purposes of calculating the 15-day review period, the day on which an informationally complete notice is received is considered day zero.

The Board believes that this streamlined 15-day notice procedure provides state member banks with the ability to respond quickly to market conditions while, at the same time, providing the Board adequate time to verify that the bank meets applicable statutory criteria. Accordingly, the Board has not adopted a procedure that would allow a state member bank to acquire a financial subsidiary (or commence a new financial activity through an existing financial subsidiary) immediately upon the filing of a notice with the Federal Reserve.

The GLB Act permits a state member bank to acquire an interest in or control a financial subsidiary if it meets the criteria and requirements set forth in the rule. The Board, however, retains its general supervisory authority for state member banks and may restrict or limit the activities of, or the acquisition or ownership of a subsidiary by, a state member bank if the Board finds the bank does not have the appropriate financial and managerial resources to conduct the activities or acquire or retain ownership of the company.

II. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

In accordance with section 4(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 604(a)), the Board must publish a final regulatory flexibility analysis with this rulemaking. The rule implements the new authority granted by the GLB Act to state member banks to acquire financial subsidiaries. Because the rule authorizes state member banks to acquire this new type of subsidiary, and thereby engage in new activities, the rule does not place any additional burden on state member banks and should, in fact, enhance the overall efficiency and flexibility of state member banks. The GLB Act makes this new authority available to all state member banks, provided the bank meets the qualifying criteria established by the Act. Accordingly, the rule applies to all state member banks, regardless of size. As of December 31, 2000, there were 991 state member banks, of which 593 had total assets of less than $150 million. The rule permits a state member bank to take advantage of this new authority by following a streamlined notice procedure, which should impose minimal burdens on small banking organizations.

III. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Board previously has reviewed, under the authority delegated to the Board by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the collection of information requirements of the final rule in accordance with section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35; 5 CFR 1320 Appendix A.1). See 66 FR 29325. The OMB control number for this rule is 7100-0292. The Federal Reserve may not conduct or sponsor, and an organization is not required to respond to, any information collection unless the Board has displayed a currently valid OMB control number.

The Federal Reserve has a continuing interest in the public's opinions of our collections of information. At any time, comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, may be sent to: Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (7100-0292), Washington, DC 20503.

IV. Administrative Procedure Act

The provisions of the rule are effective on September 17, 2001, on a final basis. The interim rule became effective, on an interim basis, on March 11, 2000, in order to allow state member banks to immediately take advantage of the new authority granted by the GLB Act to own or control financial subsidiaries. This new statutory authority became effective on March 11, 2000. Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Board requested comments on all aspects of the interim rule and has amended the rule as appropriate after reviewing the comments received.

V. Use of “Plain Language”

Section 722 of the GLB Act requires the Board to use “plain language” in all proposed and final rules published after January 1, 2000. The Board invited comment on whether the interim rule was written in “plain language” and how to make the interim rule easier to understand. Commenters stated that the interim rule was effectively organized and easy to understand. The final rule is substantially similar to the interim rule and the Board believes the final rule is written plainly and clearly.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 208

• Accounting
• Agriculture
• Banks
• Banking
• Confidential business information
• Crime
• Currency
• Federal Reserve System
• Mortgages
• Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
• Securities

Authority and Issuance

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, Title 12, Chapter II, Part 208 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 208—MEMBERSHIP OF STATE BANKING INSTITUTIONS IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM (REGULATION H)

1. The authority citation for Part 208 is revised to read as follows:

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 24, 24a, 36, 92a, 93a, 248(a), 248(c), 321-338a, 371d, 461, 481-486, 601, 611, 1814, 1816, 1818, 1820(d)(9), 1823(j), 1828(o), 1831, 1831o, 1831p-1, 1831r-1, 1831w, 1835a, 1843(l)(2), 1882, 2901-2907, 3105, 3310, 3331-3351, and 3906-3909; 15 U.S.C. 78b, 78l(b), 78l(g), 78l(i), 78o-4(c)(5), 78q, 78q-1, and 78w; 31 U.S.C. 5318; 42 U.S.C. 4012a, 4104a, 4104b, 4106 and 4128.

2. Subpart G is revised to read as follows:

Subpart G—Financial Subsidiaries of State Member Banks

(a) In general. A state member bank may control, or hold an interest in, a financial subsidiary only if:

(1) The state member bank and each depository institution affiliate of the state member bank are well capitalized and well managed;

(2) The aggregate consolidated total assets of all financial subsidiaries of the state member bank do not exceed the lesser of:

(i) 45 percent of the consolidated total assets of the parent bank; or

(ii) $50 billion, which dollar amount shall be adjusted according to an indexing mechanism jointly established by the Board and the Secretary of the Treasury;

(3) The state member bank, if it is one of the largest 100 insured banks (based on consolidated total assets as of the end of the previous calendar year), meets the debt rating or alternative requirement of paragraph (b) of this section, if applicable; and

(4) The Board or the appropriate Reserve Bank has approved the bank to acquire the interest in or control the financial subsidiary under § 208.76.

(b) Debt rating or alternative requirement for 100 largest insured banks.—(1) General. A state member bank meets the debt rating or alternative requirement of this paragraph (b) if:

(i) The bank has at least one issue of eligible debt outstanding that is currently rated in one of the three highest investment grade rating categories by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization; or

(ii) If the bank is one of the second 50 largest insured banks (based on consolidated total assets as of the end of the previous calendar year), the bank has a current long-term issuer credit rating from at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization that is within the three highest investment grade rating categories used by the organization.

(2) Financial subsidiaries engaged in financial activities only as agent. This paragraph (b) does not apply to a state member bank if the financial subsidiaries of the bank engage in financial activities described in § 208.72(a)(1) and (2) only in an agency capacity and not directly or indirectly as principal.