Supreme Court of California June 1899 casesGrimbley v. HarroldIn re Estate of NewmanWaller v. WestonAllison v. Board of EducationMoore v. HoffmanPeople v. HarrisHuellmantel v. HuellmantelKnowles v. BaldwinMontgomery v. RauerDavis & Son v. Hurgren & AndersonPorter v. ElizaldeSilveira v. IversonIn re Estate of ScottPeople v. MillerRiego v. FosterCushing v. PiresWood v. JordanFox v. MackayBlackburn v. BellDoolin v. Omnibus Cable Co.Cull v. San Francisco & Fresno Land Co.City Improvement Co. v. BroderickWilliams v. CooperIn re Estate of JamesWheeler v. KarnesIn re Estate of WalkerPeople ex rel. Pixley v. Lodi High School Dist.Estrella Vineyard Co. v. ButlerReid v. F. W. Kreling's Sons' Co.People v. CrandallClune v. QuitzowPeople v. HillSmith v. SmithSanta Cruz Bank of Savings v. TaylorBeattie v. CrewdsonFox v. MackayAlameda County v. CrockerCity and County of San Francisco v. BroderickDoyle v. Republic Life Ins. Co.Patch v. MillerKnight v. WhitmoreBergen v. FrisbieGray v. EschenDingley v. McDonaldScheerer v. GoodwinPeiser v. GriffinWood v. JordanSaunders v. La Purisima Gold Mining Co.City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyJohnson v. ReedSan Joaquin Valley Bank v. DodgeLilienthal v. BallouMcKay v. McKayPeople v. SheaBerka v. WoodwardCampbell v. DraisKenney v. ParksSmeltzer v. MillerIn re Estate of RunyonPeople v. FarleyCounty of Sonoma v. StofenHutchinson v. HutchinsonYndart v. DenKyle v. Craig