From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 3, 1981
392 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. UU-486.

December 31, 1980. Rehearing Denied February 3, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County, John W. Peach, J.

No appearance of counsel for the parties.


We affirm the trial court's denial of Benjamin Williams' Motion to Vacate under Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P.

On 19 December 1979, the trial court entered an order denying Williams' motion after a hearing at which counsel for Williams was present. On 23 January 1980, Williams wrote a letter to the trial court which appears to have been treated by the judge as a motion for rehearing and by the clerk as a second motion to vacate.

Although a motion for rehearing is authorized by Rule 3.850, it must be filed within fifteen days of the service of the order. This was not done; therefore, if it was a motion for rehearing, it was untimely. There was no appeal taken from the December order.

If, on the other hand, the letter was a second motion to vacate, it raised the same issues as those in the prior motion and would be properly denied for that reason. Rule 3.850 provides, "[T]he sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner." See also State v. Piehl, 184 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1966); Blount v. State, 203 So.2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 3, 1981
392 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN H. WILLIAMS, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 3, 1981

Citations

392 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

King v. State

Rule 3.850(f) states that "[t]he prisoner may file a motion for rehearing of any order denying a motion under…

King v. State

King's motion for rehearing, signed within fifteen days of the court's order denying his motion, was not…