From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Lamas

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jun 9, 2009
No. 08-5520RJB/JRC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 9, 2009)

Summary

granting motion to dismiss because inmate, who had potentially fatal fish allergy, did not allege any serious physical or emotional injury as a result of the decision not to provide a no-fish alternative

Summary of this case from Gauthier v. Kirkpatrick

Opinion

No. 08-5520RJB/JRC.

June 9, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDAITON


The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 20);
(2) Defendant' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim is GRANTED. That claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 20).
(3) Plaintiff may file an amended complaint regarding his Fourteenth Amendment and Sixth Amendment claims within thirty days of this order being signed.
(4) Failure to file the amended complaint will result in dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with a Court Order.
(5) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for defendants, and to the Hon. J. Richard Creatura.


Summaries of

Williams v. Lamas

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jun 9, 2009
No. 08-5520RJB/JRC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 9, 2009)

granting motion to dismiss because inmate, who had potentially fatal fish allergy, did not allege any serious physical or emotional injury as a result of the decision not to provide a no-fish alternative

Summary of this case from Gauthier v. Kirkpatrick
Case details for

Williams v. Lamas

Case Details

Full title:DEREK V. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. SANTOS LAMAS, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Jun 9, 2009

Citations

No. 08-5520RJB/JRC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 9, 2009)

Citing Cases

Gauthier v. Kirkpatrick

Even assuming that fish was frequently part of the menu, Plaintiffs have not alleged that David's medical…