From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheeler v. Dolak

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 16, 1912
120 P. 966 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 1414

Opinion Filed January 16, 1912.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiffs in error file no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla viii, 95 Pac. vi), the petition in error will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by Brewer, C.)

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge.

Action by James H. Wheeler and Matilda Foss against John Dolak and Marie Dolak. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error. Dismissed.

Shartel, Keaton Wells, for plaintiffs in error.

Jas. R. Lewis and Flynn, Ames Chambers, for defendants in error.


The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 14, 1910. The plaintiffs in error have failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi.)

The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 P. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Wheeler v. Dolak

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 16, 1912
120 P. 966 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

Wheeler v. Dolak

Case Details

Full title:WHEELER et al. v. DOLAK et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 16, 1912

Citations

120 P. 966 (Okla. 1912)
120 P. 966