From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddin v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 10, 1911
117 P. 200 (Okla. 1911)

Opinion

No. 1646

Opinion Filed January 10, 1911.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Briefs — Dismissal. Syllabus same as in Leavitt v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 P. 71.

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge.

Action between Fred V. Maddin and F. P. McCormick and others. From the judgment, Maddin brings error. Dismissed.

S. V. O'Hara, for plaintiff in error.

J. B. Furry, for defendant in error.


The petition in error and case-made attached were filed in this court May 4, 1910. On November 4, 1910, defendants in error filed motion to dismiss the appeal on the following grounds:

(1) Case-made not served in time.

(2) Petition in error not filed in time.

(3) No brief filed pursuant to rule 7 of this court.

No response has been made to said motion to dismiss.

It is not essential to pass on the first two grounds, as the third ground is sufficient, the plaintiff in error neither having filed his brief in accordance with said rule 7 nor having made application for additional time or for permission to file typewritten briefs. Leavitt et al. v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 P. 71; Monnington v. Cotteral, 26 Okla. 817, 110 P. 632; Cooper v. Chapman, 26 Okla. 600, 110 P. 722.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Maddin v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 10, 1911
117 P. 200 (Okla. 1911)
Case details for

Maddin v. McCormick

Case Details

Full title:MADDIN v. McCORMICK et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 10, 1911

Citations

117 P. 200 (Okla. 1911)
117 P. 200

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Dolak

The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27…

Terry v. Coker

The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (38…