From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wesselenyi v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1132) CA 01-00393.

September 28, 2001.

(Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fahey, J. — Bifurcate Trial.)

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, KEHOE AND GORSKI, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum:

Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendants' motion to bifurcate the trial. As a general rule, "[i]ssues of liability and damages in a negligence action are distinct and severable issues that should be tried and determined separately" ( Hrusa v. Bogdan, 278 A.D.2d 947; see, Stevens v. Dorsaneo, 267 A.D.2d 997). Plaintiffs failed to establish the applicability of the exception to the general rule, which arises when "the injuries sustained by plaintiffs have an important bearing on the issue of liability and are probative in determining how the accident occurred" ( Guizzotti v. English, 273 A.D.2d 932).


Summaries of

Wesselenyi v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Wesselenyi v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS WESSELENYI AND CAROL A. WESSELENYI, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 28, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 421