From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens v. Dorsaneo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

December 30, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Bifurcate Trial.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HAYES, WISNER, PIGOTT, JR., AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Memorandum:

Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a bifurcated trial in this personal injury action. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion and thus a fortiori failed to establish the need to depart from the general rule that "issues of liability and damages in a negligence action are distinct and severable issues which should be tried and determined separately" ( Martinez v. Town of Babylon, 191 A.D.2d 483, 484; see, Loncz v. Blagrove, 254 A.D.2d 735, 736; Cutsogeorge v. Hertz Corp., 239 A.D.2d 540; see also, 22 NYCRR 202.42[a]).


Summaries of

Stevens v. Dorsaneo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Stevens v. Dorsaneo

Case Details

Full title:JASON STEVENS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PETER DORSANEO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
700 N.Y.S.2d 887

Citing Cases

Wesselenyi v. Santiago

Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendants' motion to bifurcate the trial. As a general rule,…

Piccione v. Tri-Main Development

"`As a general rule, issues of liability and damages in a negligence action are distinct and severable issues…