From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Reid

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 19, 2014
122 A.D.3d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-11-19

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., appellant, v. Michael REID, respondent, et al., defendants.

Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, New York, N.Y. (David Dunn, Robin L. Muir, and Heather R. Gushue of counsel), for appellant.


Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, New York, N.Y. (David Dunn, Robin L. Muir, and Heather R. Gushue of counsel), for appellant.

In an action to foreclose a consolidated mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (James J. Golia, J.), entered April 5, 2013, which denied its motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint, without prejudice to renewal upon proper notice to the defendant Michael Reid.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record before this Court does not reflect that the plaintiff gave the defendant Michael Reid, who the Supreme Court noted was appearing pro se, proper notice of its motion for summary judgment ( see CPLR 2103). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint, without prejudice to renewal upon proper notice to Reid ( see Financial Servs. Veh. Trust v. Law Offs. of Dustin J. Dente, 86 A.D.3d 532, 533, 926 N.Y.S.2d 326; Zaidi v. New York Bldg. Contrs., Ltd., 61 A.D.3d 747, 748, 877 N.Y.S.2d 381; Bianco v. LiGreci, 298 A.D.2d 482, 748 N.Y.S.2d 503; Welch v. State of New York, 261 A.D.2d 537, 690 N.Y.S.2d 631).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions need not be reached in light of our determination.

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Reid

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 19, 2014
122 A.D.3d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Reid

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., appellant, v. Michael REID, respondent, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 19, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
122 A.D.3d 832
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8005

Citing Cases

Lee v. I-Sheng

The failure to provide proper service of a motion deprives the court of jurisdiction to entertain the motion…

BetzJitomir v. Neurauter

Failure to properly serve a party with the requisite notice of motion deprives the court of jurisdiction to…