From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fin Serv. Veh. Trust v. Law Offs. of Dente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 2011
86 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-08854.

July 5, 2011.

In an action for replevin and to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Katerina Arvanitakis appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, Jr., J.), entered July 19, 2010, which granted the plaintiffs motion to vacate both an order of the same court (Spinola, J.), dated February 24, 2010, granting the unopposed motion of the defendant Katerina Arvanitakis for leave to enter a judgment on her counterclaim against the plaintiff upon its default in replying to the counterclaim, and a judgment of the same court entered March 1, 2010, in her favor and against the plaintiff in the principal sum of $1 million.

Gordon Haffner, LLP, Harrison, N.Y. (David E. Gordon and Steven Cohn, P.C., of counsel), for appellant.

Deily, Mooney Glastetter, LLP, Albany, N.Y. (Alexander Powhida of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall, Austin and Miller, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Katerina Arvanitakis (hereinafter the appellant) failed to give the plaintiff timely notice of her motion for leave to enter a judgment on her counterclaim against the plaintiff upon its purported default in replying to the counter-claim ( see Bianco v LiGreci, 298 AD2d 482). The plaintiff did not receive at least 13 days' notice, the minimum required for motions served by regular mail ( see CPLR 2103 [b] [2]; 2214 [b]). Absence of proper service of a motion is a sufficient and complete excuse for a default on a motion, and deprives the court of jurisdiction to entertain the motion ( see CPLR 5015 [a] ; Zaidi v New York Bldg. Contrs., Ltd., 61 AD3d 747, 748; Daulat v Helms Bros., Inc., 32 AD3d 410, 411; Bianco v LiGreci, 298 AD2d 482; Welch v State of New York, 261 AD2d 537, 538). Since the Supreme Court was deprived of jurisdiction to entertain the motion, the resulting order dated February 24, 2010, and the judgment entered upon that order were nullities ( see Bonik v Tarrabocchia, 78 AD3d 630, 632; Bauerlein v Salvation Army, 74 AD3d 851, 857; Welch v State of New York, 261 AD2d at 538; Golden v Golden, 128 AD2d 672). Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion to vacate both the order dated February 24, 2010, and the judgment was properly granted.


Summaries of

Fin Serv. Veh. Trust v. Law Offs. of Dente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 2011
86 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Fin Serv. Veh. Trust v. Law Offs. of Dente

Case Details

Full title:FINANCIAL SERVICES VEHICLE TRUST, Respondent, v. LAW OFFICES OF DUSTIN J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 2011

Citations

86 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5797
926 N.Y.S.2d 326

Citing Cases

Freedom Chiropractic, P.C. v. 21st Century Ins. Co.

As plaintiff acknowledges on appeal, defendant argued that defendant "did not receive at least 13 days'…

Wells Fargo Bank v. Defoe

Defendants note that ex-parte applications are generally disfavored statutorily, per common law and by…