From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wechsler v. Wechsler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1993
199 A.D.2d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 7, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.).


The award of interim counsel fees was a proper exercise of discretion (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 N.Y.2d 879, 881), in view of the long duration of the marriage, defendant's unemployment and few job skills, and plaintiff's well-paying employment as a musician with a major opera company, additional income from residuals and concerts, and investments. Any inequity in the interim award should be remedied by a speedy trial (Jancu v Jancu, 174 A.D.2d 428) and a later credit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Wechsler v. Wechsler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1993
199 A.D.2d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Wechsler v. Wechsler

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE D. WECHSLER, Appellant, v. ELAINE WECHSLER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 26

Citing Cases

Lowe v. Lowe

In awarding temporary maintenance, the IAS Court carefully considered and balanced the factors enumerated in…