From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. National Car Rental

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1996
226 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to change venue. CPLR 503 (a) provides, as a general rule, that "the place of trial shall be in the county in which one of the parties resided when [the action] was commenced". Here, however, the record reveals that none of the parties resided in Queens County at the commencement of the action, and thus the plaintiff's choice of venue was improper. Accordingly, the plaintiff forfeited his right to select the place of venue ( see, Tomasulo v. Berland, 217 A.D.2d 655; Kirschner v. Cusa, 211 A.D.2d 665; Quach v. Waldbaums, Inc., 202 A.D.2d 562). Miller, J.P., Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ward v. National Car Rental

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1996
226 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Ward v. National Car Rental

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN WARD, Appellant, v. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 593

Citing Cases

Santarpia v. First Fidelity Leasing Group, Inc.

However, since none of the parties resided in Kings County at the time of the commencement of the action…

RAL Supply Corp. v. Desantis

Based upon the moving papers, it is clear that plaintiff's mistake was not in the initial designation of the…