From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quach v. Waldbaums, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1994
202 A.D.2d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 21, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is granted, and the cross motion is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to transfer the file of the action to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County.

Because, as the plaintiffs have correctly conceded, their choice of venue in the first instance was improper, they forfeited their right to select the place of venue (see, Cenziper v. Gross, 175 A.D.2d 226; Papadakis v. Command Bus Co., 91 A.D.2d 657; Siegel, N.Y. Prac § 123, at 189 [2d ed]; 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y. Civ Prac ¶ 511.04). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiffs' cross motion and denying the motion of the defendant, which is a corporation, to transfer the venue of the action to Suffolk County, where its principal office is located (see, CPLR 503 [c]). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Quach v. Waldbaums, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 1994
202 A.D.2d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Quach v. Waldbaums, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JACKSON QUACH, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, LAM QUACH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 21, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 807

Citing Cases

Ward v. National Car Rental

Here, however, the record reveals that none of the parties resided in Queens County at the commencement of…

Tomasulo v. Berland

Inasmuch as none of the parties resided in Kings County at the time of the commencement of the action…