From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vacca v. Valerino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 11, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Inglehart, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.


Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Although the appeal is from a motion designated as one to "renew", it is properly an appeal from a motion to reargue because plaintiffs submitted no new facts in support of the motion. An order denying a motion to reargue is not appealable (Matter of Jones v. Marcy, 135 A.D.2d 887, 888).


Summaries of

Vacca v. Valerino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Vacca v. Valerino

Case Details

Full title:PAUL VACCA et al., Appellants, v. PATRICK VALERINO et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 11, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
555 N.Y.S.2d 504

Citing Cases

Speis v. Penfield Cent. Sch.

Here, petitioner made her demand upon respondent no later than December 23, 2011, upon her filing of the…

Matthews v. State

The issue Claimant raises - his lack of awareness of the date he signed the claim because he was in the…