From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mikoloyck

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division
Dec 7, 2009
Case No. 09-00036-01-CR-W-GAF (W.D. Mo. Dec. 7, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 09-00036-01-CR-W-GAF.

December 7, 2009


ORDER


Now pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Outrageous Government Conduct (Doc. #15); Motion to Suppress Video and Audio Recording of January 31, 2009 Statement or in the Alternative to Order Redaction (Statement #1) (Doc. #16); and Motion to Suppress Statement of February 1, 2009 (Statement # 2) (Doc. #17).

On June 9, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays conducted an evidentiary hearing on defendant's motions. On November 13, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays issued her Report and Recommendation (Doc. #38).

Upon careful and independent review of the pending motions, as well as the applicable law, this Court hereby adopts and incorporates as its own Opinion and Order the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Outrageous Government Conduct (Doc. #15) and Defendant's Motion to Suppress Video and Audio Recording of January 31, 2009 Statement or in the Alternative to Order Redaction (Statement #1) (Doc. #16) are OVERRULED and DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statement of February 1, 2009 (Statement #2) (Doc. #17) is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mikoloyck

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division
Dec 7, 2009
Case No. 09-00036-01-CR-W-GAF (W.D. Mo. Dec. 7, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mikoloyck

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN E. MIKOLOYCK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division

Date published: Dec 7, 2009

Citations

Case No. 09-00036-01-CR-W-GAF (W.D. Mo. Dec. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Jungers

The government cites one case stating that 18 U.S.C. § 1591 applies to those who purchase underage sex. See…

United States v. Castaneda

Undercover operations of this sort have been repeatedly found to be necessary in order to protect children…