Summary
In US. Bank Natl. Assn. v Mathon, 29 Misc3d 1228 (A), 920 NYS2d 245 (Sup Ct, Suffolk County 2010), the borrowers continued to send the lender nine extra payments in reliance and compliance with a letter from the lender's servicer subsequent to the trial modification agreement expressly promising that "If you make all [3] trial period payments on lime and comply with all applicable program guidelines, you will have qualified for a final modification" and the lender's representatives verbally informed the borrowers that the underwriter had approved the final modification.
Summary of this case from Bariciano v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Opinion
December 1, 2010.
Mortgages — Modification — Trial Modification.